Anterior|Próximo

Aplicações recentes da interface cérebro-computador baseada em EEG no campo médico

  • role： Contribute equally, First author同等贡献者, 第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

    Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin 300380, China

    School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Xiu-Yun Liu123,  
  • role： Contribute equally同等贡献者
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Wen-Long Wang1,  
  • role： Contribute equally同等贡献者
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Miao Liu1,  
  • role： Contribute equally同等贡献者
  • Affiliation：

    Department of Micro/Nano Electronics, Shanghai Jiao-tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Ming-Yi Chen4,  
  • Affiliation：

    Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal

Tânia Pereira5,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Desta Yakob Doda1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Yu-Feng Ke1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China

Shou-Yan Wang6,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Intelligence Science and Technology, University of Sciences and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Dong Wen7,  
  • Affiliation：

    Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin 3003500, China

Xiao-Guang Tong8,  
  • Affiliation：

    The State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China

    State Key Laboratory for Quality Ensurance and Sustainable Use of Dao-Di Herbs, Artemisinin Research Center, and Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China

Wei-Guang Li910,  
  • Affiliation：

    Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China

    China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing 100070, China

    Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TH, UK

Yi Yang111213,  
  • Affiliation：

    Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China

Xiao-Di Han11,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Yu-Lin Sun1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Xin Song1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Cong-Ying Hao1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Zi-Hua Zhang1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Xin-Yang Liu1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Chun-Yang Li1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Rui Peng1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Xiao-Xin Song1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Abi Yasi1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Mei-Jun Pang1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Kuo Zhang1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Run-Nan He1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Department of Electric Engineer-ing and Information Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Le Wu14,  
  • Affiliation：

    Department of Rehabilitation, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China

Shu-Geng Chen15,  
  • Affiliation：

    Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China

Wen-Jin Chen16,  
  • Affiliation：

    The First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China

Yan-Gong Chao17,  
  • Affiliation：

    Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

Cheng-Gong Hu18,  
  • Affiliation：

    Department of Neu-rosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Beijing 110122, China

Heng Zhang19,  
  • Affiliation：

    Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230031, China

Min Zhou20,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Kun Wang1,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Peng-Fei Liu1,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China

Chen Chen21,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technol-ogy of China, Chengdu 611731, China

Xin-Yi Geng22,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technol-ogy of China, Chengdu 611731, China

Yun Qin22,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technol-ogy of China, Chengdu 611731, China

Dong-Rui Gao22,  
  • Affiliation：

    Shanghai Frontiers Science Research Base of Intelligent Optoelectronics and Perception, Institute of Optoelectron-ics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China

En-Ming Song23,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

  • Email：chenglonglong@cecdat.com
  • Introduction：* Long-Long Cheng chenglonglong@cecdat.com
Long-Long Cheng1*,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Department of Electric Engineer-ing and Information Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

  • Email：xunchen@ustc.edu.cn
  • Introduction：Xun Chen xunchen@ustc.edu.cn
Xun Chen14*,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Medical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

    Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin 300380, China

  • Email：richardming@tju.edu.cn
  • Introduction：Dong Ming richardming@tju.edu.cn
Dong Ming12*

Resumo

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) represent an emerging technology that facilitates direct communication between the brain and external devices. In recent years, numerous review articles have explored various aspects of BCIs, including their fundamental principles, technical advancements, and applications in specific domains. How-ever, these reviews often focus on signal processing, hardware development, or limited applications such as motor rehabilitation or communication. This paper aims to offer a comprehensive review of recent electroencephalogram(EEG)-based BCI applications in the medical field across 8 critical areas, encompassing rehabilitation, daily communi-cation, epilepsy, cerebral resuscitation, sleep, neurodegenerative diseases, anesthesiology, and emotion recognition. Moreover, the current challenges and future trends of BCIs were also discussed, including personal privacy and ethical concerns, network security vulnerabilities, safety issues, and biocompatibility.

Palavras-chave

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs);Medical applications;Rehabilitation;Communication;Brain monitoring;diagnosis

References

  1. 1..
    Mikołajewska E, Mikołajewski D. Non-invasive EEG-based brain-com-puter interfaces in patients with disorders of consciousness. Mil Med Res. 2014;1(14):1-6.
  2. 2..
    Sun Y, Jin W, Si X, Zhang X, Cao J, Wang L, et al. Continuous seizure detection based on transformer and long-term iEEG. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2022;26(11):5418-27.
  3. 3..
    Sani OG, Pesaran B, Shanechi MM. Dissociative and prioritized modeling of behaviorally relevant neural dynamics using recurrent neural net-works. Nat Neurosci. 2024;27(10):2033-45.
  4. 4..
    Levett JJ, Elkaim LM, Niazi F, Weber MH, Iorio-Morin C, Bonizzato M, et al. Invasive brain computer interface for motor restoration in spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Neuromodul Technol Neural Interface.2024;27(4):597-603.
  5. 5..
    Zhao ZP, Nie C, Jiang CT, Cao SH, Tian KX, Yu S, et al. Modulating brain activity with invasive brain-computer interface: a narrative review. Brain Sci. 2023;13(1):134.
  6. 6..
    Edelman BJ, Zhang S, Schalk G, Brunner P, Müller-Putz G, Guan C, et al. Non-invasive brain-computer interfaces: state of the art and trends. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2024. .
  7. 7..
    Jaber W, Jaber HA, Jaber R, Saleh Z. The convergence of AI and BCIs:a new era of brain-machine interfaces. Artif Intell Age Nanotechnol.2024;11:98-113.
  8. 8..
    Zhang J, Li J, Huang Z, Huang D, Yu H, Li Z. Recent progress in wearable brain-computer interface (BCI) devices based on electroencepha-logram (EEG) for medical applications: a review. Health Data Sci.2023;3:0096.
  9. 9..
    Mridha MF, Das SC, Kabir MM, Lima AA, Islam MR, Watanobe Y. Brain-computer interface: advancement and challenges. Sensors.2021;21(17):5746.
  10. 10..
    Berger H. Über das elektroenkephalogramm des menschen. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr. 1929;87(1):527-70.
  11. 11..
    Lindsley DB. Psychological phenomena and the electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1952;4:443-56.
  12. 12..
    Vidal JJ. Toward direct brain-computer communication. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1973;2(1):157-80.
  13. 13..
    Li X, Chen J, Shi N, Yang C, Gao P, Chen X, et al. A hybrid steady-state visual evoked response-based brain-computer interface with MEG and EEG. Expert Syst Appl. 2023;223:119736.
  14. 14..
    Wang J, Bi L, Fei W. EEG-based motor BCIs for upper limb movement:current techniques and future insights. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:4413-27.
  15. 15..
    Biswas P, Dodakian L, Wang PT, Johnson CA, See J, Chan V, et al. A sin-gle-center, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial to test the safety and efficacy of a novel brain-computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation (BCI-FES) intervention for gait rehabili-tation in the chronic stroke population. BMC Neurol. 2024;24(1):200.
  16. 16..
    Hramov AE, Maksimenko VA, Pisarchik AN. Physical principles of brain-computer interfaces and their applications for rehabilitation, robotics and control of human brain states. Phys Rep. 2021;918:1-133.
  17. 17..
    Pirasteh A, Shamseini Ghiyasvand M, Pouladian M. EEG-based brain-computer interface methods with the aim of rehabilitating advanced stage ALS patients. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024;19(8):3183-93.
  18. 18..
    Behboodi A, Kline J, Gravunder A, Phillips C, Parker SM, Damiano DL. Development and evaluation of a BCI-neurofeedback system with real-time EEG detection and electrical stimulation assistance during motor attempt for neurorehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024;18:1346050.
  19. 19..
    Ramakrishnan J. Cerebral palsy-affected individuals’ brain-computer interface for wheelchair movement in an indoor environment using mental tasks. Egypt Inf J. 2024;26:100470.
  20. 20..
    Brannigan JF, Fry A, Opie NL, Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Oxley TJ. Endo-vascular brain-computer interfaces in poststroke paralysis. Stroke.2024;55(2):474-83.
  21. 21..
    Nakanishi M, Miner A, Jung TP, Graves J. Novel moving steady-state visual evoked potential stimulus to assess afferent and efferent dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng.2023;31:1297-301.
  22. 22..
    Cantillo-Negrete J, Carino-Escobar RI, Leyva-Martinez I, Barrera-Ortiz A, Rodriguez-Barragan MA, Mendoza-Montoya O, et al. Upper limb recovery in cervical spinal cord injury after a brain-computer inter-face controlled functional electrical stimulation intervention. J Med Biol Eng. 2023;43(5):522-31.
  23. 23..
    Zhou Y, Yu T, Gao W, Huang W, Lu Z, Huang Q, et al. Shared three-dimensional robotic arm control based on asynchronous BCI and computer vision. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng.2023;31:3163-75.
  24. 24..
    Aggarwal S, Chugh N. Review of machine learning techniques for EEG based brain computer interface. Arch Comput Methods Eng.2022;29(5):3001-20.
  25. 25..
    Tang X, Shen H, Zhao S, Li N, Liu J. Flexible brain-computer interfaces. Nat Electron. 2023;6(2):109-18.
  26. 26..
    Chaddad A, Wu Y, Kateb R, Bouridane A. Electroencephalography signal processing: a comprehensive review and analysis of methods and techniques. Sensors. 2023;23(14):6434.
  27. 27..
    Saibene A, Caglioni M, Corchs S, Gasparini F. EEG-based BCIs on motor imagery paradigm using wearable technologies: a systematic review. Sensors. 2023;23(5):2798.
  28. 28..
    Zhuang M, Wu Q, Wan F, Hu Y. State-of-the-art non-invasive brain-computer interface for neural rehabilitation: a review. J Neurorestora-tol. 2020;8(1):12-25.
  29. 29..
    Wang W, Li B, Wang H, Wang X. An efficient EEG signal fading pro-cessing framework based on the cognitive limbic system and deep learning. Appl Intell. 2024;54(2):1566-84.
  30. 30..
    Xin C. Research on signal preprocessing methods based on brain-computer interface. MedScien. 2024;1(7):1-7.
  31. 31..
    Hanafi SA, Rahman HBA, Pertiwi DAA, Muslim MA. Brain com-puter interface (BCI) machine learning process: a review. JoETEX.2023;1(1):29-35.
  32. 32..
    Sen D, Mishra BB, Pattnaik PK. A review of the filtering techniques used in EEG signal processing. In: 2023 7th international conference on trends in electronics and informatics (ICOEI). IEEE; 2023. p. 270-7.
  33. 33..
    Viola FC, Debener S, Thorne J, Schneider TR. Using ICA for the analysis of multi-channel EEG data. Simultaneous EEG fMRI Rec. Anal Appl. 2010. p.121-33.
  34. 34..
    Kumar N, Alam K, Siddiqi AH. Wavelet transform for classification of EEG signal using SVM and ANN. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2017;10(4):2061-9.
  35. 35..
    De Clercq W, Vergult A, Vanrumste B, Van Paesschen W, Van Huffel S. Canonical correlation analysis applied to remove muscle artifacts from the electroencephalogram. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006;53(12):2583-7.
  36. 36..
    Vergult A, De Clercq W, Palmini A, Vanrumste B, Dupont P, Van Huffel S, et al. Improving the interpretation of ictal scalp EEG: BSS-CCA algorithm for muscle artifact removal. Epilepsia. 2007;48(5):950-8.
  37. 37..
    Teng C, Zhang Y, Wang G. The removal of EMG artifact from EEG signals by the multivariate empirical mode decomposition. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on signal processing, communications and computing (ICSPCC). IEEE; 2014. p. 873-6.
  38. 38..
    Xu X, Liu A, Chen X. A novel few-channel strategy for removing muscle artifacts from multichannel EEG data. In: 2017 IEEE global conference on signal and information processing (GlobalSIP). IEEE; 2017. p. 976-80.
  39. 39..
    Zhang H, Zhao M, Wei C, Mantini D, Li Z, Liu Q. EEGdenoiseNet: a benchmark dataset for deep learning solutions of EEG denoising. J Neural Eng. 2021;18(5):056057.
  40. 40..
    Brophy E, Redmond P, Fleury A, De Vos M, Boylan G, Ward T. Denoising EEG signals for real-world BCI applications using GANs. Front Neuroer-gon. 2022;2:805573.
  41. 41..
    Wang W, Li B, Wang H. A novel end-to-end network based on a bidirectional GRU and a self-attention mechanism for denoising of electroencephalography signals. Neuroscience. 2022;505:10-20.
  42. 42..
    Wang W, Li B. A novel model based on a 1D-ResCNN and transfer learning for processing EEG attenuation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2023;26(16):1980-93.
  43. 43..
    Pu X, Yi P, Chen K, Ma Z, Zhao D, Ren Y. EEGDnet: Fusing non-local and local self-similarity for EEG signal denoising with transformer. Comput Biol Med. 2022;151:106248.
  44. 44..
    Gondal M W, Schölkopf B, Hirsch M. The unreasonable effectiveness of texture transfer for single image super-resolution. In: Computer vision-ECCV 2018 workshops: Munich, Germany, September 8-14,2018, Proceedings, Part V 15. Springer International Publishing; 2019.p. 80-97.
  45. 45..
    Sawangjai P, Trakulruangroj M, Boonnag C, Piriyajitakonkij M, Tripathy RK, Sudhawiyangkul T, et al. EEGANet: removal of ocular artifacts from the EEG signal using generative adversarial networks. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2021;26(10):4913-24.
  46. 46..
    Ho J, Jain A, Abbeel P. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2020;33:6840-51.
  47. 47..
    Huang X, Li C, Liu A, Qian R, Chen X. EEGDfus: a conditional diffusion model for fine-grained EEG denoising. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf.2024:1-13.
  48. 48..
    Zhao Y, Wang G, Sun M, Zhao Z, Yan Y. Methods for removing artifacts from EEG signals: a review. In: 2024 IEEE 24th international confer-ence on software quality, reliability, and security companion (QRS-C). IEEE; 2024. p. 752-8.
  49. 49..
    Zeng K, Chen D, Ouyang G, Wang L, Liu X, Li X. An EEMD-ICA approach to enhancing artifact rejection for noisy multivariate neural data. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015;24(6):630-8.
  50. 50..
    Chen X, Chen Q, Zhang Y, Wang ZJ. A novel EEMD-CCA approach to removing muscle artifacts for pervasive EEG. IEEE Sens J.2018;19(19):8420-31.
  51. 51..
    Gao T, Chen D, Tang Y, Ming Z, Li X. EEG reconstruction with a dual-scale CNN-LSTM model for deep artifact removal. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2022;27(3):1283-94.
  52. 52..
    Yin J, Liu A, Li C, Qian R, Chen X. A GAN guided parallel CNN and transformer network for EEG denoising. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf.2023:1-12.
  53. 53..
    Boonyakitanont P, Lek-Uthai A, Chomtho K, Songsiri J. A review of feature extraction and performance evaluation in epileptic seizure detection using EEG. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2020;57:101702.
  54. 54..
    Altaheri H, Muhammad G, Alsulaiman M, Amin SU, Altuwaijri GA, Abdul W, et al. Deep learning techniques for classification of electro-encephalogram (EEG) motor imagery (MI) signals: a review. Neural Comput Appl. 2023;35(20):14681-722.
  55. 55..
    Singh AK, Krishnan S. Trends in EEG signal feature extraction applica-tions. Front Artif Intell. 2023;5:1072801.
  56. 56..
    Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27(3):379-423.
  57. 57..
    Pincus SM. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(6):2297-301.
  58. 58..
    Richman JS, Moorman JR. Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;278(6):H2039-49.
  59. 59..
    Bandt C, Pompe B. Permutation entropy: a natural complexity meas-ure for time series. Phys Rev Lett. 2002;88(17):174102.
  60. 60..
    Roberts SJ, Penny W, Rezek I. Temporal and spatial complexity meas-ures for electroencephalogram based brain-computer interfacing. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1999;37:93-8.
  61. 61..
    Altunay S, Telatar Z, Erogul O. Epileptic EEG detection using the linear prediction error energy. Expert Syst Appl. 2010;37(8):5661-5.
  62. 62..
    Lawhern VJ, Solon AJ, Waytowich NR, Gordon SM, Hung CP, Lance BJ. EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(5):056013.
  63. 63..
    Lau ZJ, Pham T, Chen SA, Makowski D. Brain entropy, fractal dimen-sions and predictability: a review of complexity measures for EEG in healthy and neuropsychiatric populations. Eur J Neurosci.2022;56(7):5047-69.
  64. 64..
    Márton L, Brassai ST, Bakó L, Losonczi L. Detrended fluctuation analysis of EEG signals. Procedia Technol. 2014;12:125-32.
  65. 65..
    Bajaj V, Pachori RB. Classification of seizure and nonseizure EEG signals using empirical mode decomposition. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed.2011;16(6):1135-42.
  66. 66..
    Hjorth B. EEG analysis based on time domain properties. Electroen-cephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1970;29(3):306-10.
  67. 67..
    Geng S, Zhou W, Yuan Q, Cai D, Zeng Y. EEG non-linear feature extrac-tion using correlation dimension and Hurst exponent. Neurol Res.2011;33(9):908-12.
  68. 68..
    Shah NA, Wusthoff CJ. How to use: amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG). Arch Dis Childhood-E. 2015;100(2):75-81.
  69. 69..
    Zanetti R, Pale U, Teijeiro T, Atienza D. Approximate zero-crossing: a new interpretable, highly discriminative and low-complexity feature for EEG and iEEG seizure detection. J Neural Eng. 2022;19(6):066018.
  70. 70..
    Grass AM, Gibbs FA. A Fourier transform of the electroencephalogram. J Neurophysiol. 1938;1(6):521-6.
  71. 71..
    Demuru M, La Cava SM, Pani SM, Fraschini M. A comparison between power spectral density and network metrics: an EEG study. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2020;57:101760.
  72. 72..
    Madhale Jadav G, Lerga J, Štajduhar I. Adaptive filtering and analysis of EEG signals in the time-frequency domain based on the local entropy. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. 2020;2020:7.
  73. 73..
    Samiee K, Kovacs P, Gabbouj M. Epileptic seizure classification of EEG time-series using rational discrete short-time fourier transform. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014;62(2):541-52.
  74. 74..
    Almanza-Conejo O, Almanza-Ojeda DL, Contreras-Hernandez JL, Ibarra-Manzano MA. Emotion recognition in EEG signals using the continuous wavelet transform and CNNs. Neural Comput Appl. 2023;35(2):1409-22.
  75. 75..
    Zheng J, Liang M, Sinha S, Ge L, Yu W, Ekstrom A, et al. Time-frequency analysis of scalp EEG with Hilbert-Huang transform and deep learning. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2021;26(4):1549-59.
  76. 76..
    Ang KK, Chin ZY, Zhang H, Guan C. Filter bank common spatial pattern(FBCSP) in brain-computer interface. In: 2008 IEEE international joint conference on neural networks (IEEE world congress on computational intelligence). IEEE; 2008. p. 2390-7.
  77. 77..
    Darvish Ghanbar K, Yousefi Rezaii T, Farzamnia A, Saad I. Correlation-based common spatial pattern (CCSP): a novel extension of CSP for classification of motor imagery signal. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0248511.
  78. 78..
    Lotte F, Guan C. Regularizing common spatial patterns to improve BCI designs: unified theory and new algorithms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.2010;58(2):355-62.
  79. 79..
    Guo Y, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Liu Y, Chen W. EEG classification by filter band component regularized common spatial pattern for motor imagery. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2020;59:101917.
  80. 80..
    Mishuhina V, Jiang X. Complex common spatial patterns on time-frequency decomposed EEG for brain-computer interface. Pattern Recognit. 2021;115:107918.
  81. 81..
    Rashid M, Sulaiman N, PP Abdul Majeed A, Musa RM, Ab. Nasir AF, Bari BS, et al. Current status, challenges, and possible solutions of EEG-based brain-computer interface: a comprehensive review. Front Neurorob.2020;14:25.
  82. 82..
    Dai G, Zhou J, Huang J, Wang N. HS-CNN: a CNN with hybrid con-volution scale for EEG motor imagery classification. J Neural Eng.2020;17(1):016025.
  83. 83..
    Supakar R, Satvaya P, Chakrabarti P. A deep learning based model using RNN-LSTM for the detection of schizophrenia from EEG data. Comput Biol Med. 2022;151:106225.
  84. 84..
    Xie J, Zhang J, Sun J, Ma Z, Qin L, Li G, et al. A transformer-based approach combining deep learning network and spatial-temporal information for raw EEG classification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2022;30:2126-36.
  85. 85..
    Zhang H. Expression-EEG based collaborative multimodal emotion recognition using deep autoencoder. IEEE Access. 2020;8:164130-43.
  86. 86..
    Liu T, Shah MZH, Yan X, Yang D. Unsupervised feature representation based on deep boltzmann machine for seizure detection. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:1624-34.
  87. 87..
    Zheng WL, Zhu JY, Peng Y. EEG-based emotion classification using deep belief networks. 2014 IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo (ICME). IEEE; 2014. p. 1-6
  88. 88..
    Tian C, Ma Y, Cammon J, Fang F, Zhang Y, Meng M. Dual-encoder VAE-GAN with spatiotemporal features for emotional EEG data augmenta-tion. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:2018-27.
  89. 89..
    Ma X, Chen W, Pei Z, Liu J, Huang B, Chen J. A temporal dependency learning CNN with attention mechanism for MI-EEG decoding. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:3188-200.
  90. 90..
    Wang W, Li B, Wang H, Wang X, Qin Y, Shi X, et al. EEG-FMCNN: a fusion multi-branch 1D convolutional neural network for EEG-based motor imagery classification. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024;62(1):107-20.
  91. 91..
    Tong L, Qian Y, Peng L, Wang C, Hou ZG. A learnable EEG channel selection method for MI-BCI using efficient channel attention. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1276067.
  92. 92..
    Ma R, Chen YF, Jiang YC, Zhang M. A new compound-limbs para-digm: integrating upper-limb swing improves lower-limb stepping intention decoding from EEG. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng.2023;31:3823-34.
  93. 93..
    Willett FR, Avansino DT, Hochberg LR, Henderson JM, Shenoy KV. High-performance brain-to-text communication via handwriting. Nature.2021;593(7858):249-54.
  94. 94..
    Daoud H, Bayoumi MA. Efficient epileptic seizure prediction based on deep learning. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2019;13(5):804-13.
  95. 95..
    Guo L, Yu T, Zhao S, Li X, Liao X, Li Y. Clep: Contrastive learning for epi-leptic seizure prediction using a spatio-temporal-spectral network. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:3915-26.
  96. 96..
    Singh J, Ali F, Gill R, Shah B, Kwak D. A survey of EEG and machine learning based methods for neural rehabilitation. IEEE Access.2023;11:114155-71.
  97. 97..
    Ma ZZ, Wu JJ, Cao Z, Hua XY, Zheng MX, Xing XX, et al. Motor imagery-based brain-computer interface rehabilitation programs enhance upper extremity performance and cortical activation in stroke patients. J Neuro Eng Rehabil. 2024;21(1):91.
  98. 98..
    Chen S, Cao L, Shu X, Wang H, Ding L, Wang SH, et al. Longitudinal electroencephalography analysis in subacute stroke patients during intervention of brain-computer interface with exoskeleton feedback. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:809.
  99. 99..
    Fu J, Chen S, Shu X, Lin Y, Jiang Z, Wei D, et al. Functional-oriented, port-able brain-computer interface training for hand motor recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled study. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1146146.
  100. 100..
    Lin Q, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zhuang W, Zhao B, Ke X, et al. The frequency effect of the motor imagery brain computer interface training on corti-cal response in healthy subjects: a randomized clinical trial of functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:810553.
  101. 101..
    Ferrero L, Quiles V, Ortiz M, Iáez E, Navarro-Arcas A, Flores-Yepes JA, et al. Comparison of different brain-computer interfaces to assess motor imagery using a lower-limb exoskeleton. In: Converging clinical and engineering research on neurorehabilitation IV: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on neurorehabilitation (ICNR2020). Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 53-8.
  102. 102..
    Dong R, Zhang X, Li H, Masengo G, Zhu A, Shi X, et al. EEG generation mechanism of lower limb active movement intention and its virtual reality induction enhancement: a preliminary study. Front Neurosci.2024;17:1305850.
  103. 103..
    Ortiz M, Ferrero L, Iáñez E, Azorín JM, Contreras-Vidal JL. Sensory integration in human movement: a new brain-machine interface based on gamma band and attention level for controlling a lower-limb exoskeleton. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:735.
  104. 104..
    Wei M, Huang M, Ni J. Cross-subject EEG channel selection method for lower limb brain-computer interface. IJNDI. 2023;2(3):100008.
  105. 105..
    Zulauf-Czaja A, Al-Taleb MK, Purcell M, Petric-Gray N, Cloughley J, Vuckovic A. On the way home: a BCI-FES hand therapy self-managed by sub-acute SCI participants and their caregivers: a usability study. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2021;18:1-18.
  106. 106..
    Miao Y, Chen S, Zhang X, Jin J, Xu R, Daly I, et al. BCI-based rehabilitation on the stroke in sequela stage. Neural Plast. 2020;2020(1):8882764.
  107. 107..
    Biasiucci A, Leeb R, Iturrate I, Perdikis S, Al-Khodairy A, Corbet T, et al. Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2421.
  108. 108..
    Bockbrader M, Annetta N, Friedenberg D, Schwemmer M, Skomrock N, Colachis IVS, et al. Clinically significant gains in skillful grasp coordina-tion by an individual with tetraplegia using an implanted brain-com-puter interface with forearm transcutaneous muscle stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(7):1201-17.
  109. 109..
    McCrimmon CM, King CE, Wang PT, Cramer SC, Nenadic Z, An HD. Brain-controlled functional electrical stimulation for lower-limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. In: 2014 36th annual international confer-ence of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. IEEE;2014. p. 1247-50
  110. 110..
    Chung E, Lee BH, Hwang S. Therapeutic effects of brain-computer interface-controlled functional electrical stimulation training on bal-ance and gait performance for stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Medicine. 2020;99(51):e22612.
  111. 111..
    Wang W, Yang B, Guan C, Li B. A VR combined with MI-BCI application for upper limb rehabilitation of stroke. In: 2019 IEEE MTT-S international microwave biomedical conference (IMBioC). IEEE; 2019. p. 1-4.
  112. 112..
    Su H, Wang S, Huang M, Chen Y, Lu A, Yang R. VR and exoskeleton assisted lower limb rehabilitation based on motor imagery BCI. In: 2023 IEEE international biomedical instrumentation and technology confer-ence (IBITeC). IEEE; 2023. p. 74-9
  113. 113..
    Aamer A, Esawy A, Omnia Swelam O, Toaa Nabil T, Ayman Anwar A, Eldeib ABCI, Integrated with VR for Rehabilitation. In,. 31st international conference on microelectronics (ICM). IEEE. 2019;2019:166-9.
  114. 114..
    Xu J, Liu TL, Wu Z, Wu Z, Li Y, Nürnberger A. Neurorehabilitation system in virtual reality with low-cost BCI devices. In: 2020 IEEE international conference on human-machine systems (ICHMS). IEEE; 2020. p. 1-3.
  115. 115..
    Lin CJ, Sie TY. Integration of virtual reality-enhanced motor imagery and brain-computer interface for a lower-limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robot. Actuators. 2024;13(7):244.
  116. 116..
    Devidas K. Enhancing neurorehabilitation through closed-loop control of robotic exoskeletons and brain-computer interfaces. J Electr Syst.2024;20(1s):1010-22.
  117. 117..
    Basteris A, Nijenhuis SM, Stienen AH, Buurke JH, Prange GB, Amirabdol-lahian F. Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilita-tion in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2014;11:1-15.
  118. 118..
    Bhagat NA, Yozbatiran N, Sullivan JL, Paranjape R, Losey C, Hernandez Z, et al. Neural activity modulations and motor recovery following brain-exoskeleton interface mediated stroke rehabilitation. Neuroimage-Clin.2020;28:102502.
  119. 119..
    Cantillo-Negrete J, Carino-Escobar RI, Carrillo-Mora P, Rodriguez-Barra-gan MA, Hernandez-Arenas C, Quinzaños-Fresnedo J, et al. Brain-com-puter interface coupled to a robotic hand orthosis for stroke patients’neurorehabilitation: a crossover feasibility study. Front Hum Neurosci.2021;15:656975.
  120. 120..
    Jochumsen M, Janjua TAM, Arceo JC, Lauber J, Buessinger ES, Kæseler RL. Induction of neural plasticity using a low-cost open source brain-computer interface and a 3D-printed wrist exoskeleton. Sensors.2021;21(2):572.
  121. 121..
    Lakshminarayanan K, Ramu V, Shah R, Sunny MSH, Madathil D, Brahmi B, et al. Developing a tablet-based brain-computer interface and robotic prototype for upper limb rehabilitation. PeerJ Comput Sci.2024;10:e2174.
  122. 122..
    Bi J, Chu M. TDLNet: Transfer data learning network for cross-subject classification based on multiclass upper limb motor imagery EEG. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:3958-67.
  123. 123..
    Zhang R, Feng S, Hu N, Low S, Li M, Chen X, et al. Hybrid brain-com-puter interface controlled soft robotic glove for stroke rehabilitation. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2024;28(7):4194-203.
  124. 124..
    He Y, Eguren D, Azorín JM, Grossman RG, Luu TP, Contreras-Vidal JL. Brain-machine interfaces for controlling lower-limb powered robotic systems. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(2):021004.
  125. 125..
    Arya K, Pandian S. Interlimb neural coupling: Implications for poststroke hemiparesis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014;57(9-10):696-713.
  126. 126..
    Wolpaw JR, Wolpaw EW. Brain-computer interfaces: something new under the sun. Brain-Comput Interfaces Princ Pract. 2012;14:3-12.
  127. 127..
    Zhang J, Liu D, Chen W, Pei Z, Wang J. Boosting lower-limb motor imagery performance through an ensemble method for gait rehabilita-tion. Comput Biol Med. 2024;169:107910.
  128. 128..
    Lu Y, Guo S, Wang M, Chen L. Continuous control method for lower limb rehabilitation robot based on self-learning strategy. In: 2024 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation (ICMA). IEEE;2024. p. 782-7.
  129. 129..
    Lin PJ, Li W, Zhai X, Li Z, Sun J, Xu Q, et al. Explainable deep-learning prediction for brain-computer interfaces supported lower extremity motor gains based on multi-state fusion. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024;32:1546-55.
  130. 130..
    Fadli RA, Yamanouchi Y, Jovanovic LI, Popovic MR, Marquez-Chin C, Nomura T, et al. Effectiveness of motor and prefrontal cortical areas for brain-controlled functional electrical stimulation neuromodulation. J Neural Eng. 2023;20(5):056022.
  131. 131..
    Choi I, Kwon GH, Lee S, Nam CS. Functional electrical stimulation con-trolled by motor imagery brain-computer interface for rehabilitation. Brain Sci. 2020;10(8):512.
  132. 132..
    Ferrero L, Quiles V, Ortiz M, Iáñez E, Gil-Agudo Á, Azorín JM. Brain-computer interface enhanced by virtual reality training for controlling a lower limb exoskeleton. Iscience. 2023;26(5):106675.
  133. 133..
    Wen D, Fan Y, Hsu SH, Xu J, Zhou Y, Tao J, et al. Combining brain-com-puter interface and virtual reality for rehabilitation in neurological diseases: a narrative review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;64(1):101404.
  134. 134..
    Chen J, Xia Y, Zhou X, Vidal Rosas E, Thomas A, Loureiro R, et al.fNIRS-EEG BCIs for motor rehabilitation: a review. Bioengineering.2023;10(12):1393.
  135. 135..
    Blankertz B, Dornhege G, Krauledat M, et al. The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface presents the novel mental typewriter Hex-o-Spell. In: Proceed-ings of the 3rd international brain-computer interface workshop and training course. 2006. p. 1-24.
  136. 136..
    D’Albis T, Blatt R, Tedesco R, Sbattella L, Matteucci M. A predictive speller controlled by a brain-computer interface based on motor imagery. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact. 2012;19(3):1-25.
  137. 137..
    Cao L, Xia B, Maysam O, Li J, Xie H, Birbaumer N. A synchronous motor imagery based neural physiological paradigm for brain computer interface speller. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:274.
  138. 138..
    Acqualagna L, Treder M S, Blankertz B. Chroma Speller: Isotropic visual stimuli for truly gaze-independent spelling. In: 2013 6th international IEEE/EMBS conference on neural engineering (NER). IEEE; 2013. p.1041-4.
  139. 139..
    Akram F, Han SM, Kim TS. An efficient word typing P300-BCI system using a modified T9 interface and random forest classifier. Comput Biol Med. 2015;56:30-6.
  140. 140..
    Korkmaz OE, Aydemir O, Oral EA, Ozbek IY. An efficient 3D column-only P300 speller paradigm utilizing few numbers of electrodes and flash-ings for practical BCI implementation. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0265904.
  141. 141..
    Xiao X, Xu M, Han J, Yin E, Liu S, Zhang X, et al. Enhancement for P300-speller classification using multi-window discriminative canonical pattern matching. J Neural Eng. 2021;18(4):046079.
  142. 142..
    Blanco-Díaz C, Guerrero-Méndez C, Ruiz-Olaya A. Enhancing P300 detection using a band-selective filter bank for a visual P300 speller. IRBM. 2023;44(3):100751.
  143. 143..
    Liu M, Ahmad F, Beyette FR. Transfer learning for P300 speller: an align-ment approach for cross-subject P300 data. In: SoutheastCon 2024. IEEE, 2024. p. 1438-43.
  144. 144..
    Han J, Xu M, Xiao X, Yi W, Jung TP, Ming D. A high-speed hybrid brain-computer interface with more than 200 targets. J Neural Eng.2023;20(1):016025.
  145. 145..
    Sun Q, Zheng L, Pei W, Gao X, Wang Y. A 120-target brain-computer interface based on code-modulated visual evoked potentials. J Neuro-sci Methods. 2022;375:109597.
  146. 146..
    Sadeghi S, Maleki A. A modified hybrid brain-computer interface speller based on steady-state visual evoked potentials and electromyogram. J Integr Neurosci. 2024;23(4):73.
  147. 147..
    Mannan MMN, Kamran MA, Kang S, Choi HS, Jeong MY. A hybrid speller design using eye tracking and SSVEP brain-computer interface. Sensors.2020;20(3):891.
  148. 148..
    Tang J, Xu M, Han J, Liu M, Dai T, Chen S, et al. Optimizing SSVEP-based BCI system towards practical high-speed spelling. Sensors.2020;20(15):4186.
  149. 149..
    Yin E, Zhou Z, Jiang J, Chen F, Liu Y, Hu D. A speedy hybrid BCI spell-ing approach combining P300 and SSVEP. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.2013;61(2):473-83.
  150. 150..
    Bai X, Li M, Qi S, Ng ACM, Ng T, Qian W. A hybrid P300-SSVEP brain-computer interface speller with a frequency enhanced row and column paradigm. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1133933.
  151. 151..
    Luo W, Yin W, Liu Q, Qu Y. A hybrid brain-computer interface using motor imagery and SSVEP based on convolutional neural network. Brain-Appar Commun J Bacomics. 2023;2(1):2258938.
  152. 152..
    Pei L, Ouyang G. Online recognition of handwritten characters from scalp-recorded brain activities during handwriting. J Neural Eng.2021;18(4):046070.
  153. 153..
    Zhou W, Wang Y, Mo L, Li C, Xu M, Kong W, et al. Temporal-channel cascaded transformer for imagined handwriting character recognition. Neurocomputing. 2024;573:127243.
  154. 154..
    Angrick M, Luo S, Rabbani Q, Candrea DN, Shah S, Milsap GW, et al. Online speech synthesis using a chronically implanted brain-computer interface in an individual with ALS. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):9617.
  155. 155..
    Luo S, Angrick M, Coogan C, Candrea DN, Wyse-Sookoo K, Shah S, et al. Stable decoding from a speech BCI enables control for an individual with ALS without recalibration for 3 months. Adv Sci.2023;10(35):2304853.
  156. 156..
    Chen X, Wang R, Khalilian-Gourtani A, Yu L, Dugan P, Friedman D, et al. A neural speech decoding framework leveraging deep learning and speech synthesis. Nat Mach Intell. 2024:1-14.
  157. 157..
    Xu T, Ji Z, Xu X, Wang L. Filter bank temporally local multivariate syn-chronization index for SSVEP-based BCI. BMC Bioinf. 2024;25(1):227.
  158. 158..
    Rezeika A, Benda M, Stawicki P, Gembler F, Saboor A, Volosyak I. Brain-computer interface spellers: a review. Brain Sci. 2018;8(4):57.
  159. 159..
    Perdikis S, Leeb R, d R Millán J. Context-aware adaptive spelling in motor imagery BCI. J Neural Eng. 2016;13(3):036018.
  160. 160..
    Farwell LA, Donchin E. Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988;70(6):510-23.
  161. 161..
    Blankertz B, Müller KR, Curio G, Vaughan TM, Schalk G, Wolpaw JR, et al. The BCI competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detec-tion and discrimination of EEG single trials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.2004;51(6):1044-51.
  162. 162..
    Jin J, Horki P, Brunner C, Wang X, Neuper C, Pfurtscheller G. A new P300 stimulus presentation pattern for EEG-based spelling systems. Biomed Tech. 2010;55(4):203-10.
  163. 163..
    Fazel-Rezai R, Abhari K. A region-based P300 speller for brain-computer interface. Can J Electr Comput Eng. 2009;34(3):81-5.
  164. 164..
    Oralhan Z. 2 stages-region-based P300 speller in brain-computer inter-face. IETE J Res. 2019;65(6):740-8.
  165. 165..
    Obeidat QT, Campbell TA, Kong J. Introducing the edges paradigm: a P300 brain-computer interface for spelling written words. IEEE Trans Hum-Mach Syst. 2015;45(6):727-38.
  166. 166..
    Medina-Juliá MT, Fernández-Rodríguez Á, Velasco-Álvarez F, Ron-Angevin R. P300-based brain-computer interface speller: usability evaluation of three speller sizes by severely motor-disabled patients. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:583358.
  167. 167..
    Xu M, Qi H, Wan B, Yin T, Liu Z, Ming D. A hybrid BCI speller paradigm combining P300 potential and the SSVEP blocking feature. J Neural Eng. 2013;10(2):026001.
  168. 168..
    Bekhelifi O, Berrached NE, Bendahmane A. Effects of the presentation order of stimulations in sequential ERP/SSVEP hybrid brain-computer interface. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2024;10(3):035009.
  169. 169..
    Kundu S, Ari S. Brain-computer interface speller system for alternative communication: a review. IRBM. 2022;43(4):317-24.
  170. 170..
    Liu Y, Zhao Z, Xu M, Yu H, Zhu Y, Zhang J, et al. Decoding and synthesizing tonal language speech from brain activity. Sci Adv.2023;9(23):eadh0478.
  171. 171..
    Luo S, Rabbani Q, Crone NE. Brain-computer interface: applications to speech decoding and synthesis to augment communication. Neuro-therapeutics. 2023;19(1):263-73.
  172. 172..
    Card NS, Wairagkar M, Iacobacci C, Hou X, Singer-Clark T, Willett FR, et al. An accurate and rapidly calibrating speech neuroprosthesis. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(7):609-18.
  173. 173..
    Devinsky O, Vezzani A, O’Brien TJ, Jette N, Scheffer IE, de Curtis M, et al. Epilepsy (primer). Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(1):18024.
  174. 174..
    Moshé SL, Perucca E, Ryvlin P, Tomson T. Epilepsy: new advances. Lan-cet. 2015;385(9971):884-98.
  175. 175..
    Perucca E, Perucca P, White HS, Wirrell EC. Drug resistance in epilepsy. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22(8):723-34.
  176. 176..
    Faust O, Acharya UR, Adeli H, Adeli A. Wavelet-based EEG processing for computer-aided seizure detection and epilepsy diagnosis. Seizure.2015;26:56-64.
  177. 177..
    Nogay HS, Adeli H. Detection of epileptic seizure using pretrained deep convolutional neural network and transfer learning. Lancet Neurol. 2021;83(6):602-14.
  178. 178..
    Tang Y, Durand DM. A tunable support vector machine assem-bly classifier for epileptic seizure detection. Expert Syst Appl.2012;39(4):3925-38.
  179. 179..
    Mursalin M, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Chawla NV. Automated epileptic seizure detection using improved correlation-based feature selection with random forest classifier. Neurocomputing. 2017;241:204-14.
  180. 180..
    Wei X, Zhou L, Chen Z, Zhang L, Zhou Y. Automatic seizure detection using three-dimensional CNN based on multi-channel EEG. BMC Med Inf Decis Making. 2018;18:71-80.
  181. 181..
    Covert I, Krishnan B, Najm I, Zhan J, Shore M, Hixson J, et al. Temporal graph convolutional networks for automatic seizure detection. In:Machine learning for healthcare conference. PMLR; 2019. p. 160-80.
  182. 182..
    Peh WY, Thangavel P, Yao Y, Thomas J, Tan YL, Dauwels J. Six-center assessment of CNN-transformer with belief matching loss for patient-independent seizure detection in EEG. Int J Neural Syst.2023;33(03):2350012.
  183. 183..
    Hossain MS, Amin SU, Alsulaiman M, Muhammad G. Applying deep learning for epilepsy seizure detection and brain mapping visualiza-tion. ACM T Multim Comput. 2019;15(1s):1-17.
  184. 184..
    Shoeibi A, Khodatars M, Ghassemi N, Jafari M, Moridian P, Alizad-ehsani R, et al. Epileptic seizures detection using deep learning tech-niques: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5780.
  185. 185..
    Burrello A, Cavigelli A, Schindler K, Benini L, Rahimi A. Laelaps: An energy-efficient seizure detection algorithm from long-term human iEEG recordings without false alarms. In: 2019 design, automation &test in Europe conference & exhibition (DATE). IEEE; 2019. p. 752-7
  186. 186..
    Ahmad I, Wang X, Javeed D, Kumar P, Samuel OW, Chen S. A hybrid deep learning approach for epileptic seizure detection in EEG signals. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2023:1-12.
  187. 187..
    Pan Y, Dong F, Yao W, Meng X, Xu Y. Empirical mode decomposition for deep learning-based epileptic seizure detection in few-shot scenario. IEEE Access. 2024;12:86583-95.
  188. 188..
    Kuhlmann L, Lehnertz K, Richardson MP, Schelter B, Zaveri HP. Seizure prediction—ready for a new era. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(10):618-30.
  189. 189..
    Jacobs J, Staba R, Asano E, Otsubo H, Wu J, Zijlmans M, et al. High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) in clinical epilepsy. Prog Neurobiol.2012;98(3):302-15.
  190. 190..
    Zijlmans M, Jiruska P, Zelmann R, Leijten FS, Jefferys JG, Gotman J. High-frequency oscillations as a new biomarker in epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2012;71(2):169-78.
  191. 191..
    Gallotto S, Seeck M. EEG biomarker candidates for the identification of epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2023;8:32-41.
  192. 192..
    Wilson MA, McNaughton BL. Reactivation of hippocampal ensemble memories during sleep. Science. 1994;265(5172):676-9.
  193. 193..
    Lachner-Piza D, Kunz L, Brandt A, Dümpelmann M, Thomschewski A, Schulze-Bonhage A. Effects of spatial memory processing on hip-pocampal ripples. Front Neurol. 2021;12:620670.
  194. 194..
    Staba RJ, Bragin A. High-frequency oscillations and other electro-physiological biomarkers of epilepsy: underlying mechanisms. Biomarkers Med. 2011;5(5):545-56.
  195. 195..
    Coito A, Genetti M, Pittau F, Iannotti GR, Thomschewski A, Höller Y, et al. Altered directed functional connectivity in temporal lobe epilepsy in the absence of interictal spikes: a high density EEG study. Epilepsia. 2016;57(3):402-11.
  196. 196..
    Carboni M, De Stefano P, Vorderwülbecke BJ, Tourbier S, Mullier E, Rubega M, et al. Abnormal directed connectivity of resting state networks in focal epilepsy. Neuroimage-Clin. 2020;27:102336.
  197. 197..
    Cook MJ, O’Brien TJ, Berkovic SF, Murphy M, Morokoff A, Fabinyi G, et al. Prediction of seizure likelihood with a long-term, implanted seizure advisory system in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a first-in-man study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(6):563-71.
  198. 198..
    Brinkmann BH, Wagenaar J, Abbot D, Adkins P, Bosshard SC, Chen M, et al. Crowdsourcing reproducible seizure forecasting in human and canine epilepsy. Brain. 2016;139(6):1713-22.
  199. 199..
    Gao Y, Liu A, Wang L, Qian R, Chen X. A self-interpretable deep learn-ing model for seizure prediction using a multi-scale prototypical part network. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:1847-56.
  200. 200..
    Welch WP, Sitwat B, Sogawa Y. Use of vagus nerve stimulator on children with primary generalized epilepsy. J Child Neurol.2018;33(7):449-52.
  201. 201..
    Gedela S, Sitwat B, Welch WP, Krafty RT, Sogawa Y. The effect of vagus nerve stimulator in controlling status epilepticus in children. Seizure.2018;55:66-9.
  202. 202..
    Grasl S, Janik S, Dressler A, Diehm R, Gröppel G, Eichinger K, et al. Management and outcome of vagus nerve stimulator implantation:experience of an otolaryngeal/neuropediatric cooperation. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-L. 2021;278(10):3891-9.
  203. 203..
    Freund BE, Greco E, Okromelidze L, Mendez J, Tatum WO, Grewal SS, et al. Clinical outcome of imaging-based programming for anterior thalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. J Neurosurg.2022;138(4):1008-15.
  204. 204..
    Kobayashi K, Taylor KN, Shahabi H, Krishnan B, Joshi A, Mackow MJ, et al. Effective connectivity relates seizure outcome to electrode placement in responsive neurostimulation. Brain Commun. 2024;6(1):fcae035.
  205. 205..
    Kassiri H, Salam MT, Pazhouhandeh MR, Soltani N, Velazquez JLP, Carlen P, et al. Rail-to-rail-input dual-radio 64-channel closed-loop neurostimu-lator. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits. 2017;52(11):2793-810.
  206. 206..
    Campos-Rodriguez C, Palmer D, Forcelli PA. Optogenetic stimulation of the superior colliculus suppresses genetic absence seizures. Brain.2023;146(10):4320-35.
  207. 207..
    van Blooijs D, Blok S, Aarnoutse E, van Klink N, Huiskamp G, Bourez-Swart M, et al. Closed-loop cortical network stimulation as treatment for refractory epilepsy originating from the primary motor cortex.medRxiv. 2023:2023.11.11.23298410.
  208. 208..
    Anderson DN, Charlebois CM, Smith EH, Davis TS, Peters AY, Newman BJ, et al. Closed-loop stimulation in periods with less epileptiform activ-ity drives improved epilepsy outcomes. Brain. 2024;147(2):521-31.
  209. 209..
    Richmond TS. Cerebral resuscitation after global brain ischemia: linking research to practice. Aacn Adv Crit Care. 1997;8(2):171-81.
  210. 210..
    He S, Chen X. Research progress of Chinese and Western Medicine to promote awakening of consciousness disorder after stroke. Chinese Med. 2023;5(10):115-20.
  211. 211..
    Chatelle C, Chennu S, Noirhomme Q, Cruse D, Owen AM, Laureys S. Brain-computer interfacing in disorders of consciousness. Brain Inj.2012;26(12):1510-22.
  212. 212..
    Chai X, Cao T, He Q, Wang N, Zhang X, Shan X, et al. Brain-computer interface digital prescription for neurological disorders. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024;30(2):e14615.
  213. 213..
    Pan J, Xie Q, He Y, Wang F, Di H, Laureys S, et al. Detecting awareness in patients with disorders of consciousness using a hybrid brain-computer interface. J Neural Eng. 2014;11(5):056007.
  214. 214..
    Qin N, Cao Q, Li F, Wang W, Peng X, Wang L. A nomogram based on quantitative EEG to predict the prognosis of nontraumatic coma patients in the neuro-intensive care unit. Intensive Crit Care Nurs.2024;83:103618.
  215. 215..
    Yang C, Yan X, Wang Y, Chen Y, Zhang H, Gao X. Spatio-temporal equali-zation multi-window algorithm for asynchronous SSVEP-based BCI. J Neural Eng. 2021;18(4):0460b7.
  216. 216..
    Jovanovic LI, Kapadia N, Lo L, Zivanovic V, Popovic MR, Marquez-Chin C. Restoration of upper limb function after chronic severe hemiplegia:a case report on the feasibility of a brain-computer interface-triggered functional electrical stimulation therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehab.2020;99(3):e35-40.
  217. 217..
    Frolov AA, Mokienko O, Lyukmanov R, Biryukova E, Kotov S, Turbina L, et al. Post-stroke rehabilitation training with a motor-imagery-based brain-computer interface (BCI)-controlled hand exoskeleton: a rand-omized controlled multicenter trial. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:400.
  218. 218..
    Wu Q, Yue Z, Ge Y, Ma D, Yin H, Zhao H, et al. Brain functional networks study of subacute stroke patients with upper limb dysfunction after comprehensive rehabilitation including BCI training. Front Neurol.2020;10:1419.
  219. 219..
    Satapathy SK, Brahma B, Panda B, Barsocchi P, Bhoi AK. Machine learning-empowered sleep staging classification using multi-modality signals. BMC Med Inf Decis Making. 2024;24(1):119.
  220. 220..
    Rahe C, Czira ME, Teismann H, Berger K. Associations between poor sleep quality and different measures of obesity. Sleep Med.2015;16(10):1225-8.
  221. 221..
    Kita T, Yoshioka E, Satoh H, Saijo Y, Kawaharada M, Okada E, et al. Short sleep duration and poor sleep quality increase the risk of diabetes in Japanese workers with no family history of diabetes. Diabetes Care.2012;35(2):313-8.
  222. 222..
    Hoevenaar-Blom MP, Spijkerman AM, Kromhout D, Van Den Berg JF, Verschuren WM. Sleep duration and sleep quality in relation to 12-year cardiovascular disease incidence: the MORGEN study. Sleep.2011;34(11):1487-92.
  223. 223..
    Rumble ME, White KH, Benca RM. Sleep disturbances in mood disor-ders. Psychiat Clin Nam. 2015;38(4):743-59.
  224. 224..
    Bruno RM, Palagini L, Gemignani A, Virdis A, Di Giulio A, Ghiadoni L, et al. Poor sleep quality and resistant hypertension. Sleep Med.2013;14(11):1157-63.
  225. 225..
    Loh HW, Ooi CP, Vicnesh J, Oh SL, Faust O, Gertych A, et al. Automated detection of sleep stages using deep learning techniques: A systematic review of the last decade (2010-2020). Appl Sci. 2020;10(24):8963.
  226. 226..
    Kong G, Li C, Peng H, Han Z, Qiao H. EEG-based sleep stage classifica-tion via neural architecture search. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng.2023;31:1075-85.
  227. 227..
    Yang B, Zhu X, Liu Y, Liu H. A single-channel EEG based automatic sleep stage classification method leveraging deep one-dimensional con-volutional neural network and hidden Markov model. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2021;68: 102581.
  228. 228..
    Sano A, Chen W, Lopez-Martinez D, Taylor S, Picard RW. Multimodal ambulatory sleep detection using LSTM recurrent neural networks. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2018;23(4):1607-17.
  229. 229..
    Yao H, Liu T, Zou R, Ding S, Xu Y. A spatial-temporal transformer archi-tecture using multi-channel signals for sleep stage classification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:3353-62.
  230. 230..
    Jia Z, Lin Y, Wang J, Zhou R, Ning X, He Y, et al. GraphSleepNet: adaptive spatial-temporal graph convolutional networks for sleep stage clas-sification. IJCAI. 2021:1324-30.
  231. 231..
    Eldele E, Ragab M, Chen Z, Wu M, Kwoh CK, Li X. Self-supervised learning for label-efficient sleep stage classification: a comprehensive evaluation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:1333-42.
  232. 232..
    Kandel A, Buzsáki G. Cellular-synaptic generation of sleep spindles, spike-and-wave discharges, and evoked thalamocortical responses in the neocortex of the rat. J Neurosci. 1997;17(17):6783-97.
  233. 233..
    Prehn-Kristensen A, Munz M, Göder R, Wilhelm I, Korr K, Vahl W, et al. Transcranial oscillatory direct current stimulation during sleep improves declarative memory consolidation in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder to a level comparable to healthy controls. Brain Stimul. 2014;7(6):793-9.
  234. 234..
    Saebipour MR, Joghataei MT, Yoonessi A, Sadeghniiat-Haghighi K, Khalighinejad N, Khademi S. Slow oscillating transcranial direct current stimulation during sleep has a sleep-stabilizing effect in chronic insom-nia: a pilot study. J Sleep Res. 2015;24(5):518-25.
  235. 235..
    Bellesi M, Riedner BA, Garcia-Molina GN, Cirelli C, Tononi G. Enhance-ment of sleep slow waves: underlying mechanisms and practical consequences. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:208.
  236. 236..
    Ngo HVV, Claussen JC, Born J, Mölle M. Induction of slow oscillations by rhythmic acoustic stimulation. J Sleep Res. 2013;22(1):22-31.
  237. 237..
    Perl O, Arzi A, Sela L, Secundo L, Holtzman Y, Samnon P, et al. Odors enhance slow-wave activity in non-rapid eye movement sleep. J Neuro-physiol. 2016;115(5):2294-302.
  238. 238..
    Pereira SIR, Beijamini F, Weber FD, Vincenzi RA, da Silva FAC, Louzada FM. Tactile stimulation during sleep alters slow oscillation and spindle densities but not motor skill. Physiol Behav. 2017;169:59-68.
  239. 239..
    Tegeler CL, Gerdes L, Shaltout HA, Cook JF, Simpson SL, Lee SW, et al. Successful use of closed-loop allostatic neurotechnology for post-traumatic stress symptoms in military personnel: self-reported and autonomic improvements. Mil Med Res. 2017;4:1-11.
  240. 240..
    Choi J, Kwon M, Jun SC. A systematic review of closed-loop feedback techniques in sleep studies-related issues and future directions. Sensors. 2020;20(10):2770.
  241. 241..
    Lustenberger C, Boyle MR, Alagapan S, Mellin JM, Vaughn BV, Fröhlich F. Feedback-controlled transcranial alternating current stimulation reveals a functional role of sleep spindles in motor memory consolidation. Curr Biol. 2016;26(16):2127-36.
  242. 242..
    Santostasi G, Malkani R, Riedner B, Bellesi M, Tononi G, Paller KA, et al. Phase-locked loop for precisely timed acoustic stimulation during sleep. J Neurosci Methods. 2016;259:101-14.
  243. 243..
    Ketz N, Jones AP, Bryant NB, Clark VP, Pilly PK. Closed-loop slow-wave tACS improves sleep-dependent long-term memory generalization by modulating endogenous oscillations. J Neurosci. 2018;38(33):7314-26.
  244. 244..
    Ngo HVV, Staresina BP. Shaping overnight consolidation via slow-oscil-lation closed-loop targeted memory reactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(44):e2123428119.
  245. 245..
    Ferster ML, Lustenberger C, Karlen W. Configurable mobile system for autonomous high-quality sleep monitoring and closed-loop acoustic stimulation. IEEE Sens Lett. 2019;3(5):1-4.
  246. 246..
    Lu J, Yan M, Wang Q, Li P, Jing Y, Gao D. A system based on machine learning for improving sleep. J Neurosci Methods. 2023;397:109936.
  247. 247..
    Bressler S, Neely R, Yost RM, Wang D, Read HL. A wearable EEG system for closed-loop neuromodulation of sleep-related oscillations. J Neural Eng. 2023;20(5):056030.
  248. 248..
    Jalbert JJ, Daiello LA, Lapane KL. Dementia of the Alzheimer type. Epidemiol Rev. 2008;30(1):15-34.
  249. 249..
    Breijyeh Z, Karaman R. Comprehensive review on Alzheimer’s disease:causes and treatment. Molecules. 2020;25(24):5789.
  250. 250..
    D’Cruz MM, Banerjee D. The person is not the disease-revisiting Alzhei-mer’s dementia after 120 years. J Geriatr Ment Health. 2021;8(2):136-7.
  251. 251..
    Fukushima A, Morooka R, Tanaka H, Kentaro H, Tugawa A, Hanyu H. Classification of dementia type using the brain-computer interface. Artif Life Rob. 2021;26:216-21.
  252. 252..
    Ung WC, Tang TB, Meriaudeau F, Ebenezer EGM. Dynamic optimization of mental workload in fNIRS-BCI system for cognitive rehabilitation. In:2017 IEEE international conference on signal and image processing applications (ICSIPA). IEEE; 2017. p. 320-3.
  253. 253..
    Kang MK, Hong KS. Application of deep learning techniques to diag-nose mild cognitive impairment: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. In: 2021 21st international conference on control, automation and systems (ICCAS). IEEE; 2021. p. 2036-42.
  254. 254..
    Wang M, Hua Y, Bai Y. A review of the application of exercise interven-tion on improving cognition in patients with Alzheimer’s disease:mechanisms and clinical studies. Rev Neurosci. 2025;36(1):1-25.
  255. 255..
    Roy SK, Wang JJ, Xu YM. Effects of exercise interventions in Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. Brain Behav. 2023;13(7):3051.
  256. 256..
    Andrade-Guerrero J, Rodríguez-Arellano P, Barron-Leon N, Orta-Salazar E, Ledesma-Alonso C, Díaz-Cintra S, et al. Advancing Alzheimer’s thera-peutics: exploring the impact of physical exercise in animal models and patients. Cells. 2023;12(21):2531.
  257. 257..
    Bonanni R, Cariati I, Cifelli P, Frank C, Annino G, Tancredi V, et al. Exercise to counteract Alzheimer’s disease: what do fluid biomarkers say?. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(13):6951.
  258. 258..
    Galvin-McLaughlin D, Klee D, Memmott T, Peters B, Wiedrick J, Fried-Oken M, et al. Methodology and preliminary data on feasibility of a neurofeedback protocol to improve visual attention to letters in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022;28:100950.
  259. 259..
    Lin, Yayu, IWei Shu, and Fiza Singh. Frontal gamma as a marker of effec-tive training during neurofeedback to improve memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment. In: 2023 11th international IEEE/EMBS conference on neural engineering (NER). IEEE; 2023. p. 1-4.
  260. 260..
    White PJ, Moussavi Z. Neurocognitive treatment for a patient with Alzheimer’s disease using a virtual reality navigational environment. J Exp Neurosci. 2016;10:129-35.
  261. 261..
    Leeb R, Pérez-Marcos D. Brain-computer interfaces and virtual reality for neurorehabilitation. Handb Clin Neurol. 2020;168:183-97.
  262. 262..
    Jiang X, Gao T. An EEG emotion classification system based on one-dimension convolutional neural networks and virtual reality. In:Innovative mobile and internet services in ubiquitous computing:proceedings of the 14th international conference on innovative mobile and internet services in ubiquitous computing (IMIS-2020). Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 194-202.
  263. 263..
    Lin PJ, Ku HC, Lin LL. Design and development of cognitive training systems based on extended reality and BCI technology. In: 2024 IEEE 7th Eurasian conference on educational innovation (ECEI). IEEE; 2024. p.4-7.
  264. 264..
    Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, Poewe W, Olanow CW, Oertel W, et al. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord.2015;30(12):1591-601.
  265. 265..
    Jellinger KA. Synuclein deposition and non-motor symptoms in Parkin-son disease. J Neurol Sci. 2011;310(1-2):107-11.
  266. 266..
    Shimamoto SA, Ryapolova-Webb ES, Ostrem JL, Galifianakis NB, Miller KJ, Starr PA. Subthalamic nucleus neurons are synchronized to primary motor cortex local field potentials in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci.2013;33(17):7220-33.
  267. 267..
    Kühn AA, Kupsch A, Schneider GH, Brown P. Reduction in subthalamic 8-35 Hz oscillatory activity correlates with clinical improvement in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23(7):1956-60.
  268. 268..
    Swann NC, De Hemptinne C, Aron AR, Ostrem JL, Knight RT, Starr PA. Elevated synchrony in Parkinson disease detected with electroenceph-alography. Ann Neurol. 2015;78(5):742-50.
  269. 269..
    Okun MS. Deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med.2012;367(16):1529-38.
  270. 270..
    Olchik MR, Ghisi M, Ayres A, Schuh AFS, Oppitz PP, de Mello Rieder CR. The impact of deep brain stimulation on the quality of life and swallowing in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Int Arch Otorhinolar.2018;22(02):125-9.
  271. 271..
    Little S, Pogosyan A, Neal S, Zavala B, Zrinzo L, Hariz M, et al. Adaptive deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol.2013;74(3):449-57.
  272. 272..
    Benninger DH, Lomarev M, Lopez G, Wassermann EM, Li X, Considine E, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of Parkin-son’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(10):1105-11.
  273. 273..
    Montupil J, Defresne A, Bonhomme V. The raw and processed electro-encephalogram as a monitoring and diagnostic tool. J Cardiothor Vasc An. 2019;33:S3-10.
  274. 274..
    Schmierer T, Li T, Li Y. Harnessing machine learning for EEG signal analy-sis: Innovations in depth of anaesthesia assessment. Artif Intell Med.2024;151:102869.
  275. 275..
    Sharma NK, Shahid S, Kumar S, Sharma S, Gupta RK, Kumar N. Predicting depth of anesthesia using EEG signals and deep convolution network. In: AIMLSystems 2023: The third international conference on artificial intelligence and machine learning systems. 2023. p. 1-8.
  276. 276..
    Gifani P, Rabiee HR, Hashemi M, Taslimi P, Ghanbari M. Optimal fractal-scaling analysis of human EEG dynamic for depth of anesthesia quanti-fication. J Franklin Inst. 2007;344(3-4):212-29.
  277. 277..
    Oliveira CRD, Bernardo WM, Nunes VM. Benefit of general anesthesia monitored by bispectral index compared with monitoring guided only by clinical parameters. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2017;67(1):72-84.
  278. 278..
    Punjasawadwong Y, Phongchiewboon A, Bunchungmongkol N. Bispectral index for improving anaesthetic delivery and postoperative recovery. Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2014;2014(6):CD003843.
  279. 279..
    Kreuer S, Bruhn J, Larsen R, Bialas P, Wilhelm W. Comparability of Nar-cotrendTM index and bispectral index during propofol anaesthesia. Brit J Anaesth. 2004;93(2):235-40.
  280. 280..
    Doenicke AW, Kugler J, Kochs E, Rau J, Mückter H, Hoernecke R, et al. The NarcotrendTM monitor and the electroencephalogram in propofol-induced sedation. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(4):982-92.
  281. 281..
    Jones JH, Nittur VR, Fleming N, Applegate RL. Simultaneous comparison of depth of sedation performance between SedLine and BIS during general anesthesia using custom passive interface hardware: study protocol for a prospective, non-blinded, non-randomized trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21(1):105.
  282. 282..
    Obert DP, Schneider F, Schneider G, von Dincklage F, Sepulveda P, García PS, et al. Performance of the SEDLine monitor: age dependency and time delay. Anesth Analg. 2023;137(4):887-95.
  283. 283..
    Zhang H, Zhou QQ, Chen H, Hu XQ, Li WG, Bai Y, et al. The applied prin-ciples of EEG analysis methods in neuroscience and clinical neurology. Mil Med Res. 2023;10(1):67.
  284. 284..
    Qi X, Fang J, Sun Y, Xu W, Li G. Altered functional brain network struc-ture between patients with high and low generalized anxiety disorder. Diagnostics. 2023;13(7):1292.
  285. 285..
    Zhou S, Gao T, Xu J. Mental pressure recognition method based on CNN model and EEG signal under cross session. Symmetry. 2023;15(6):1173.
  286. 286..
    Aminiroshan Z, Gholamian J, Mahmoudi A, Pirjamadi S. Investigating the cognitive process of attention while watching sports advertise-ments in interested and non-interested people using electroencepha-logram technology. J Manag Stud. 2024;17(2):393-408.
  287. 287..
    Luo M, Gan Q, Huang Z, Jiang Y, Li K, Wu M, et al. Changes in mental health and EEG biomarkers of undergraduates under different patterns of mindfulness. Brain Topogr. 2024;37(1):75-87.
  288. 288..
    Niu Y, Di K, Zeng G, Wei T, Zhang Y, Wu X. Towards better video services:an EEG-based interpretable model for functional quality of experience evaluation. Displays. 2024;82:102657.
  289. 289..
    Liu Y, Yu Y, Ye Z, Li M, Zhang Y, Zhou Z, et al. Fusion of spatial, temporal, and spectral EEG signatures improves multilevel cognitive load predic-tion. IEEE Trans Hum-Mach Syst. 2023;53(2):357-66.
  290. 290..
    Rabbani M, Sayed Mamun SM, Sridevi P, Iqbal I, Parida A, Kolli A. A chaos-based non-linear analysis method for detecting human attention levels in EEG signals. In: 2023 IEEE 23rd international conference on bioinformatics and bioengineering (BIBE). IEEE; 2023. p. 201-4.
  291. 291..
    Goering S, Klein E, Specker Sullivan L, Wexler A, Agüera y Arcas B, Bi G, et al. Recommendations for responsible development and application of neurotechnologies. Neuroethics. 2021;14(3):365-86.
  292. 292..
    Kellmeyer P. Big brain data: on the responsible use of brain data from clinical and consumer-directed neurotechnological devices. Neuroeth-ics. 2021;14(1):83-98.
  293. 293..
    Steel E, Fowler G. Facebook in privacy breach. WSJ. 2010;18(1):1-4.
  294. 294..
    Ravindra V, Grama A. De-anonymization attacks on neuroimaging datasets. In: Proceedings of the 2021 international conference on management of data. 2021. p. 2394-8.
  295. 295..
    Ajrawi S, Rao R, Sarkar M. Cybersecurity in brain-computer inter-faces: RFID-based design-theoretical framework. Inf Med Unlocked.2021;22:100489.
  296. 296..
    Brocal F. Brain-computer interfaces in safety and security fields: risks and applications. Saf Sci. 2023;160:106051.
  297. 297..
    Maiseli B, Abdalla AT, Massawe LV, Mbise M, Mkocha K, Nassor NA, et al. Brain-computer interface: trend, challenges, and threats. Brain Inf.2023;10(1):20.
  298. 298..
    Wu N, Wan S, Su S, Huang H, Dou G, Sun L. Electrode materials for brain-machine interface: a review. InfoMat. 2021;3(11):1174-94.
  299. 299..
    Mian SY, Honey JR, Carnicer-Lombarte A, Barone DG. Large animal stud-ies to reduce the foreign body reaction in brain-computer interfaces: a systematic review. Biosensors. 2021;11(8):275.
  300. 300..
    Schicktanz S, Amelung T, Rieger JW. Qualitative assessment of patients’attitudes and expectations toward BCIs and implications for future technology development. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015;9:64.
  301. 301..
    Xia R, Yang S. Factors influencing the social acceptance of brain-computer interface technology among Chinese general public: an exploratory study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024;18:1423382.
  302. 302..
    Grevet E, Forge K, Tadiello S, et al. A large-scale study on the general public to assess and model the acceptability of BCIs dedicated to motor rehabilitation after stroke. In: 10th international BCI meeting.2023.
  303. 303..
    Xu M, He F, Jung TP, Gu X, Ming D. Current challenges for the practical application of electroencephalography-based brain-computer inter-faces. Engineering. 2021;7(12):1710-2.
  304. 304..
    Wen S, Yin A, Furlanello T, Perich MG, Miller LE, Itti L. Rapid adaptation of brain-computer interfaces to new neuronal ensembles or participants via generative modelling. Nat Biomed Eng. 2023;7(4):546-58.
  305. 305..
    Wu D, Xu Y, Lu BL. Transfer learning for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces: a review of progress made since 2016. IEEE Trans Cognit Dev Syst. 2020;14(1):4-19.
  306. 306..
    Xia K, Deng L, Duch W, Wu D. Privacy-preserving domain adaptation for motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022;69(11):3365-76.
  307. 307..
    Wang Y, Xie Z, Huang H, Liang X. Pioneering healthcare with soft robotic devices: a review. Smart Med. 2024;3(1):e20230045.
  308. 308..
    Lai QT, Zhao XH, Sun QJ, Tang Z, Tang XG, Roy VA. Emerging MXene-based flexible tactile sensors for health monitoring and haptic percep-tion. Small. 2023;19(27):2300283.
  309. 309..
    Fernández E, Alfaro A, Soto-Sánchez C, Gonzalez-Lopez P, Lozano AM, Peña S, et al. Visual percepts evoked with an intracortical 96-channel microelectrode array inserted in human occipital cortex. J Clin Invest.2021;131(23):e151331.

Leia o texto completo

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website