Your Location:
Home >
Browse articles >
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?
- Military Medical Research Vol. 7, Issue 3, Pages: 359-370(2020)
DOI: 10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8
Scan QR Code
Full Text(HTML)
Figs( 0 ) Tabs( 1 )
References
Publication Info
Metrics
11
Views
21
Downloads
26
CSCD
Alert me when the article has been cited
Submit
Tools
- BibTeXDownload
- EndnoteDownload
- RefMan Download
- NoteExpressDownload
- NoteFirstDownload
Related Articles
Identifying prognostic factors for conservative treatment outcomes in servicemen with chronic exertional compartment syndrome treated at a rehabilitation center
Engineering of functional auditory neurons from human induced pluripotent stem cells
Endothelial barrier and sepsis: mechanisms and potential therapeutic strategies
Frostbite: diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and future directions
From RCT to mechanistic study: ATRA reverses myofibroblast activation by reprogramming glucose metabolism via HIC1 and PCK1/2 to attenuate hypertrophic scar formation
Related Author
Mariëtte Z. Meulekamp
Peter van der Wurff
Alfred van der Meer
Cees Lucas
Related Institution
Research and Development, Military Rehabilitation Centre
Department of Physiotherapy, HU University of Applied Sciences
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam

