您当前的位置:
首页 >
文章列表页 >
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?
REVIEW | 更新时间:2023-06-05
    • Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?

    • Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?

    • Lin-Lu Ma ,Yun-Yun Wang ,Zhi-Hua Yang ,Di Huang ,Hong Weng ,Xian-Tao Zeng
    • MMR 2020年7卷第3期 页码:359-370
    • DOI: 10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8     

      中图分类号:

    移动端阅览

  •  
  •  
  • HTML全文

  • 图( 0 ) 表( 1 )

  • 参考文献

  • 出版信息

  • 数据统计

论文导航
icon
试读结束,您可以激活您的VIP账号继续阅读。
去激活 >
icon
试读结束,您可以通过登录账户,到个人中心,购买VIP会员阅读全文。
已是VIP会员?
去登录 >

11

浏览量

21

下载量

26

CSCD

文章被引用时,请邮件提醒。
提交
工具集
  • BibTeX下载
  • Endnote下载
  • RefMan 下载
  • NoteExpress下载
  • NoteFirst下载

相关文章

Identifying prognostic factors for conservative treatment outcomes in servicemen with chronic exertional compartment syndrome treated at a rehabilitation center
Maladaptive reorganization of mediodorsal thalamus as a central mechanism in neuropathic pain-related sleep disorders
Metabolic syndrome and risk of sepsis and sepsis-related mortality: evidence from two large prospective cohort studies
Bridging the lung cancer screening eligibility gap: evaluation of guideline applicability in asymptomatic patients
Octopus-inspired engineered bacteria with a plug-and-play surface display system achieves enhanced tumor-specific colonization and antitumor immunity

相关作者

Mariëtte Z. Meulekamp
Peter van der Wurff
Alfred van der Meer
Cees Lucas

相关机构

Research and Development, Military Rehabilitation Centre
Department of Physiotherapy, HU University of Applied Sciences
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam