1.Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
2.Shenzhen Research Institute of Big Data, Shenzhen, China
3.College of Mathematics and Statistics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
4.Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
* tongt@hkbu.edu.hk
纸质出版:2022-02
Scan QR Code
Meta-analysis with zero-event studies: a comparative study with application to COVID-19 data[J]. 解放军医学杂志(英文版), 2022,9(1):126-137.
Wei et al.: Meta-analysis with zero-event studies: a comparative study with application to COVID-19 data. Mil Med Res, 2021, 8: 41.
Meta-analysis with zero-event studies: a comparative study with application to COVID-19 data[J]. 解放军医学杂志(英文版), 2022,9(1):126-137. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-021-00331-6.
Wei et al.: Meta-analysis with zero-event studies: a comparative study with application to COVID-19 data. Mil Med Res, 2021, 8: 41. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-021-00331-6.
Background:
2
Meta-analysis is a statistical method to synthesize evidence from a number of independent studies
including those from clinical studies with binary outcomes. In practice
when there are zero events in one or both groups
it may cause statistical problems in the subsequent analysis.
Methods:
2
In this paper
by considering the relative risk as the effect size
we conduct a comparative study that consists of four continuity correction methods and another state-of-the-art method without the continuity correction
namely the generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs). To further advance the literature
we also introduce a new method of the continuity correction for estimating the relative risk.
Results:
2
From the simulation studies
the new method performs well in terms of mean squared error when there are few studies. In contrast
the generalized linear mixed model performs the best when the number of studies is large. In addition
by reanalyzing recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) data
it is evident that the double-zero-event studies impact the estimate of the mean effect size.
Conclusions:
2
We recommend the new method to handle the zero-event studies when there are few studies in a meta-analysis
or instead use the GLMM when the number of studies is large. The double-zero-event studies may be informative
and so we suggest not excluding them.
Borenstein M , Hedges LV , Higgins JPT , Rothstein HR . Introduction to Meta-Analysis . Chichester, UK : John Wiley & Son ; 2011 .
Ma LL , Wang YY , Yang ZH , Huang D , Weng H , Zeng XT . Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? Mil Med Res . 2020 ; 7 : 7 .
Davey J , Turner RM , Clarke MJ , Higgins JPT . Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the cochrane database of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis . BMC Med Res Methodol . 2011 ; 11 : 160 .
Jackson D , Law M , Stijnen T , Viechtbauer W , White IR . A comparison of seven random–effects models for meta-analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio . Stat Med . 2018 ; 37 ( 7 ): 1059 - 85 .
Ren Y , Lin L , Lian Q , Zou H , Chu H . Real-world performance of meta-analysis methods for double-zero-event studies with dichotomous outcomes using the cochrane database of systematic reviews . J Gen Intern Med . 2019 ; 34 ( 6 ): 960 - 8 .
Vandermeer B , Bialy L , Hooton N , Hartling L , Klassen TP , Johnston BC , Wiebe N . Meta-analyses of safety data: a comparison of exact versus asymptotic methods . Stat Methods Med Res . 2009 ; 18 ( 4 ): 421 - 32 .
Kuss O . Statistical methods for meta-analyses including information from studies without any events–add nothing to nothing and succeed nevertheless . Stat Med . 2015 ; 34 ( 7 ): 1097 - 116 .
Chu DK , Akl EA , Duda S , Solo K , Yaacoub S , Schünemann HJ , COVID-19 Systematic Urgent Review Group Effort (SURGE) study authors . Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS- CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Lancet . 2020 ; 395 ( 10242 ): 1973 - 87 .
Jin YH , Cai L , Cheng ZS , Cheng H , Deng T , Fan YP , et al . A rapid advice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infected pneumonia (standard version) . MilMed Res . 2020 ; 7 : 4 .
Jin YH , Zhan QY , Peng ZY , Ren XQ , Yin XT , Cai L , et al . Chemoprophylaxis, diagnosis, treatments, and discharge management of COVID-19: An evidence-based clinical practice guideline (updated version) . Mil Med Res . 2020 ; 7 : 41 .
Borenstein M , Hedges LV , Higgins JP , Rothstein HR . A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta–analysis . Res Synth Methods . 2010 ; 1 ( 2 ): 97 - 111 .
Lin E , Tong T , Chen Y , Wang Y . Fixed-effects model: the most convincing model for meta-analysis with few studies . Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.04211.2020 https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.04211.2020 .
Xu C , Li L , Lin L , Chu H , Thabane L , Zou K , Sun X . Exclusion of studies with no events in both arms in meta-analysis impacted the conclusions . J Clin Epidemiol . 2020 ; 123 : 91 - 9 .
Agresti A . Categorical Data Analysis , 2nd Edition . Hoboken : John Wiley & Son ; 2003 .
Haldane JB . The estimation and significance of the logarithm of a ratio of frequencies . Ann Hum Genet . 1956 ; 20 ( 4 ): 309 - 11 .
Schwarzer G . meta: An r package for meta-analysis . R News . 2007 ; 7 : 40 - 5 .
Weber F , Knapp G , Ickstadt K , Kundt G , Glass Ä . Zero–cell corrections in random–effects meta–analyses . Res Synth Methods . 2020 ; 11 ( 6 ): 913 - 9 .
Sweeting MJ , Sutton AJ , Lambert PC . What to add to nothing? use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta–analysis of sparse data . Stat Med . 2004 ; 23 ( 9 ): 1351 - 75 .
Carter RE , Lin Y , Lipsitz SR , Newcombe RG , Hermayer KL . Relative risk estimated from the ratio of two median unbiased estimates . J Royal Stat Soc: Ser C Appl Stat . 2010 ; 59 ( 4 ): 657 - 71 .
Chu H , Nie L , Chen Y , Huang Y , Sun W . Bivariate random effects models for meta-analysis of comparative studies with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk . Stat Methods Med Res . 2012 ; 21 ( 6 ): 621 - 33 .
Chen Y , Hong C , Ning Y , Su X . Meta–analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta–binomial model approach . Stat Med . 2016 ; 35 ( 1 ): 21 - 40 .
DerSimonian R , Laird N . Meta-analysis in clinical trials . Control Clin Trials . 1986 ; 7 ( 3 ): 177 - 88 .
Laird NM , Mosteller F . Some statistical methods for combining experimental results . Int J Technol Assess Heal Care . 1990 ; 6 ( 1 ): 5 - 30 .
Balduzzi S , Rücker G , Schwarzer G . How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial . Evid Based Ment Health . 2019 ; 22 ( 4 ): 153 - 60 .
Pettigrew HM , Gart JJ , Thomas DG . The bias and higher cumulants of the logarithm of a binomial variate . Biometrika . 1986 ; 73 ( 2 ): 425 - 35 .
Hartung J , Knapp G . A refined method for the meta–analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome . Stat Med . 2001 ; 20 ( 24 ): 3875 - 89 .
Fattorini L . Applying the Horvitz-Thompson criterion in complex designs: a computer-intensive perspective for estimating inclusion probabilities . Biometrika . 2006 ; 93 ( 2 ): 269 - 78 .
Seber GAF . Statistical Models for Proportions and Probabilities . Heidelberg : Springer ; 2013 .
Bakbergenuly I , Kulinskaya E . Meta-analysis of binary outcomes via generalized linear mixed models: a simulation study . BMC Med Res Methodol . 2018 ; 18 ( 1 ): 70 .
McCullagh P . Sampling bias and logistic models . J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol . 2008 ; 70 ( 4 ): 643 - 77 .
Zeger SL , Liang KY , Albert PS . Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach . Biometrics . 1988 ; 44 ( 4 ): 1049 - 60 .
Lin L , Chu H . Meta-analysis of proportions using generalized linear mixed models . Epidemiology . 2020 ; 31 ( 5 ): 713 - 7 .
Lin L , Chu H . altmeta: Alternative Meta-Analysis Methods . 2020 . https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=altmeta https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=altmeta .
Ju J , Lin L , Chu H , Cheng LL , Xu C . Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive gauss-hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data . BMC Med Res Methodol . 2020 ; 20 ( 1 ): 152 .
Gronsbell J , Hong C , Nie L , Lu Y , Tian L . Exact inference for the random–effect model for meta–analyses with rare events . Stat Med . 2020 ; 39 ( 3 ): 252 - 64 .
Sarmanov O . Generalized normal correlation and two-dimensional fréchet classes . Sov Math Dokl . 1966 ; 7 : 596 - 9 .
Chen Y , Luo S , Chu H , Su X , Nie L . An empirical Bayes method for multivariate meta-analysis with an application in clinical trials . Commun Stat Theory Methods . 2014 ; 43 ( 16 ): 3536 - 51 .
Luo S , Chen Y , Su X , Chu H . mmeta: an R package for multivariate meta-analysis . J Stat Softw . 2014 ; 56 ( 11 ): 11 .
Jia P , Lin L , Kwong JSW , Xu C . Many meta-analyses of rare events in the cochrane database of systematic reviews were underpowered . J Clin Epidemiol . 2021 ; 131 : 113 - 22 .
Li QK , Rice K . Improved inference for fixed–effects meta–analysis of 2×2 tables . Res Synth Methods . 2020 ; 11 ( 3 ): 387 - 96 .
Bender R , Friede T , Koch A , Kuss O , Schlattmann P , Schwarzer G , Skipka G . Methods for evidence synthesis in the case of very few studies . Res Synth Methods . 2018 ; 9 ( 3 ): 382 - 92 .
Rice K , Higgins JP , Lumley T . A re–evaluation of fixed effect(s) meta–analysis . J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Methodol . 2018 ; 181 ( 1 ): 205 - 27 .
Yang K , Kwan HY , Yu Z , Tong T . Model selection between the fixed-effects model and the random-effects model in meta-analysis . Stat Interface . 2020 ; 13 ( 4 ): 501 - 10 .
Friedrich JO , Adhikari NK , Beyene J . Inclusion of zero total event trials in meta-analyses maintains analytic consistency and incorporates all available data . BMC Med Res Methodol . 2007 ; 7 : 5 .
Doi SA , Furuya-Kanamori L , Xu C , Lin L , Chivese T , Thalib L . Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: a call for change to practice . J Clin Epidemiol . 2020 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.019 .
Xiao M , Chen Y , Cole SR , MacLehose R , Richardson D , Chu H . Is OR “portable” in meta-analysis? Time to consider bivariate generalized linear mixed model . 2020 . Preprint at https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.05.20226811v1 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.05.20226811v1 .
Doi SA , Furuya-Kanamori L , Xu C , Chivese T , Lin L , Musa OA , Hindy G , Thalib L , Harrell Jr FE . The OR is “portable” but not the RR: time to do away with the log link in binomial regression . J Clin Epidemiol . 2021 . https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31631.10407 https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31631.10407 .
0
浏览量
0
Downloads
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621