Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?

REVIEW | Updated：2023-06-05

- Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?
- Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?
- MMR 2020年7卷第3期页码：359-370
- Affiliations：
  
  1.Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, China.
  2.Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, the Second Clinical College, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China.
  3.Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China.
  4.Global Health Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.
- Author bio：
  
  * zengxiantao1128@163.com; zengxiantao@whucebtm.com
- Funds：
  
  the Entrusted Project of National Center for Medical Service Administration, National Health and Family Planning Commission China([2019]099);the National Key Research and Development Plan of China (Technology helps Economy 2020)(2016YFC0106300);the Nature Science Foundation of Hubei Province(2019FFB03902)
- DOI：10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2020-09
- Accepted：
Scan QR Code
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?[J]. MMR, 2020,7(3):359-370.

Ma et al.: Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?. Mil Med Res,2020, 7: 7
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?[J]. MMR, 2020,7(3):359-370. DOI： 10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8.

Ma et al.: Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?. Mil Med Res,2020, 7: 7 DOI： 10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8.

摘要

Abstract

Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment is an important step before study initiation usage. Therefore

accurately judging study type is the first priority

and the choosing proper tool is also important. In this review

we introduced methodological quality assessment tools for randomized controlled trial (including individual and cluster)

animal study

non-randomized interventional studies (including follow-up study

controlled before-and-after study

before-after/ pre-post study

uncontrolled longitudinal study

interrupted time series study)

cohort study

case-control study

cross-sectional study (including analytical and descriptive)

observational case series and case reports

comparative effectiveness research

diagnostic study

health economic evaluation

prediction study (including predictor finding study

prediction model impact study

prognostic prediction model study)

qualitative study

outcome measurement instruments (including patient - reported outcome measure development

content validity

structural validity

internal consistency

cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance

reliability

measurement error

criterion validity

hypotheses testing for construct validity

and responsiveness)

systematic review and meta-analysis

and clinical practice guideline. The readers of our review can distinguish the types of medical studies and choose appropriate tools. In one word

comprehensively mastering relevant knowledge and implementing more practices are basic requirements for correctly assessing the methodological quality.

关键词

Keywords

references

Stavrou A , Challoumas D , Dimitrakakis G . Archibald Cochrane(1909-1988): the father of evidence-based medicine . Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg . 2013 ; 18 ( 1 ): 121 - 4 .

Group E-BMW . Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine . JAMA . 1992 ; 268 ( 17 ): 2420 - 5 .

Levin A . The Cochrane collaboration . Ann Intern Med . 2001 ; 135 ( 4 ): 309 - 12 .

Lau J , Ioannidis JP , Schmid CH . Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough . Lancet . 1998 ; 351 ( 9096 ): 123 - 7 .

Clarke M , Chalmers I . Meta-analyses, multivariate analyses, and coping with the play of chance . Lancet . 1998 ; 351 ( 9108 ): 1062 - 3 .

Oxman AD , Schunemann HJ , Fretheim A . Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence . Health Res Policy Syst . 2006 ; 4 : 20 .

Zhang J , Wang Y , Weng H , Wang D , Han F , Huang Q , et al . Management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: quality of clinical practice guidelines and variations in recommendations . BMC Cancer . 2019 ; 19 ( 1 ): 1054 .

Campbell DT . Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings . Psychol Bull . 1957 ; 54 ( 4 ): 297 - 312 .

Higgins J , Green S . Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011 ]. The Cochrane Collaboration ; 2011 .

Juni P , Altman DG , Egger M . Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials . BMJ . 2001 ; 323 ( 7303 ): 42 - 6 .

Zeng X , Zhang Y , Kwong JS , Zhang C , Li S , Sun F , et al . The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review . J Evid Based Med . 2015 ; 8 ( 1 ): 2 - 10 .

A Medical Research Council Investigation . Treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis with streptomycin and Para-aminosalicylic acid . Br Med J . 1950 ; 2 ( 4688 ): 1073 - 85 .

Armitage P . Fisher, Bradford Hill, and randomization . Int J Epidemiol . 2003 ; 32 ( 6 ): 925 - 8 .

Higgins JP , Altman DG , Gotzsche PC , Juni P , Moher D , Oxman AD , et al . The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials . BMJ . 2011 ; 343 : d5928 .

Sterne JAC , Savovic J , Page MJ , Elbers RG , Blencowe NS , Boutron I , et al . RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials . BMJ . 2019 ; 366 : l4898 .

Maher CG , Sherrington C , Herbert RD , Moseley AM , Elkins M . Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials . Phys Ther . 2003 ; 83 ( 8 ): 713 - 21 .

Shiwa SR , Costa LO , Costa Lda C , Moseley A , Hespanhol Junior LC , Venancio R , et al . Reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro scale . Cad Saude Publica . 2011 ; 27 ( 10 ): 2063 - 8 .

Ibbotson T , Grimshaw J , Grant A . Evaluation of a programme of workshops for promoting the teaching of critical appraisal skills . Med Educ . 1998 ; 32 ( 5 ): 486 - 91 .

Singh J . Critical appraisal skills programme . J Pharmacol Pharmacother . 2013 ; 4 ( 1 ): 76 .

Taylor R , Reeves B , Ewings P , Binns S , Keast J , Mears R . A systematic review of the effectiveness of critical appraisal skills training for clinicians . Med Educ . 2000 ; 34 ( 2 ): 120 - 5 .

Jadad AR , Moore RA , Carroll D , Jenkinson C , Reynolds DJ , Gavaghan DJ , et al . Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary ? Control Clin Trials . 1996 ; 17 ( 1 ): 1 - 12 .

Schulz KF , Chalmers I , Hayes RJ , Altman DG . Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials . JAMA . 1995 ; 273 ( 5 ): 408 - 12 .

Hartling L , Ospina M , Liang Y , Dryden DM , Hooton N , Krebs Seida J , et al . Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study . BMJ . 2009 ; 339 : b4012 .

Verhagen AP , de Vet HC , de Bie RA , Kessels AG , Boers M , Bouter LM , et al . The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus . J Clin Epidemiol . 1998 ; 51 ( 12 ): 1235 - 41 .

Chalmers TC , Jr Smith H , Blackburn B , Silverman B , Schroeder B , Reitman D , et al . A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial . Control Clin Trials . 1981 ; 2 ( 1 ): 31 - 49 .

Downs SH , Black N . The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions . J Epidemiol Community Health . 1998 ; 52 ( 6 ): 377 - 84 .

West S , King V , Carey TS , Lohr KN , McKoy N , Sutton SF , et al . Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence . Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) . 2002 ; 47 : 1 - 11 .

Sibbald WJ . An alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management . Crit Care . 2000 ; 4 ( Suppl 2 ): S8 - 15 .

Perel P , Roberts I , Sena E , Wheble P , Briscoe C , Sandercock P , et al . Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review . BMJ . 2007 ; 334 ( 7586 ): 197 .

Hooijmans CR , Ritskes-Hoitinga M . Progress in using systematic reviews of animal studies to improve translational research . PLoS Med . 2013 ; 10 ( 7 ): e1001482 .

Stroke Therapy Academic Industry R . Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development . Stroke . 1999 ; 30 ( 12 ): 2752 - 8 .

Fisher M , Feuerstein G , Howells DW , Hurn PD , Kent TA , Savitz SI , et al . Update of the stroke therapy academic industry roundtable preclinical recommendations . Stroke . 2009 ; 40 ( 6 ): 2244 - 50 .

Macleod MR , O'Collins T , Howells DW , Donnan GA . Pooling of animal experimental data reveals influence of study design and publication bias . Stroke . 2004 ; 35 ( 5 ): 1203 - 8 .

Hooijmans CR , Rovers MM , de Vries RB , Leenaars M , Ritskes-Hoitinga M , Langendam MW . SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies . BMC Med Res Methodol . 2014 ; 14 : 43 .

McCulloch P , Taylor I , Sasako M , Lovett B , Griffin D . Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions . BMJ . 2002 ; 324 ( 7351 ): 1448 - 51 .

Deeks JJ , Dinnes J , D'Amico R , Sowden AJ , Sakarovitch C , Song F , et al . Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies . Health Technol Assess . 2003 ; 7 ( 27 ): 1 - 173 .

Sterne JA , Hernan MA , Reeves BC , Savovic J , Berkman ND , Viswanathan M , et al . ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions . BMJ . 2016 ; 355 : i4919 .

Slim K , Nini E , Forestier D , Kwiatkowski F , Panis Y , Chipponi J . Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors):development and validation of a new instrument . ANZ J Surg . 2003 ; 73 ( 9 ): 712 - 6 .

Moga C , Guo B , Schopflocher D , Harstall C . Development of a quality appraisal tool for case series studies using a modified delphi technique 2012 .(Accept 15 Januray 2020 ). http://www.ihe.ca/documents/Case%20series%20studies%20using %20a%20 modified%20Delphi%20technique.pdf http://www.ihe.ca/documents/Case%20series%20studies%20using %20a%20 modified%20Delphi%20technique.pdf .

Reisch JS , Tyson JE , Mize SG . Aid to the evaluation of therapeutic studies . Pediatrics . 1989 ; 84 ( 5 ): 815 - 27 .

Dreyer NA , Schneeweiss S , McNeil BJ , Berger ML , Walker AM , Ollendorf DA , et al . GRACE principles: recognizing high-quality observational studies of comparative effectiveness . Am J Manag Care . 2010 ; 16 ( 6 ): 467 - 71 .

Grimes DA , Schulz KF . An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land . Lancet . 2002 ; 359 ( 9300 ): 57 - 61 .

Grimes DA , Schulz KF . Cohort studies: marching towards outcomes . Lancet . 2002 ; 359 ( 9303 ): 341 - 5 .

Wells G , Shea B , O'Connell D , Peterson J , Welch V , Losos M , et al . The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomised studies in meta-analyses . (Accessed 16 Jan 2020 ). http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp .

Stang A . Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses . Eur J Epidemiol . 2010 ; 25 ( 9 ): 603 - 5 .

Wu L , Li BH , Wang YY , Wang CY , Zi H , Weng H , et al . Periodontal disease and risk of benign prostate hyperplasia: a cross-sectional study . Mil Med Res . 2019 ; 6 ( 1 ): 34 .

Downes MJ , Brennan ML , Williams HC , Dean RS . Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) . BMJ Open . 2016 ; 6 ( 12 ): e011458 .

Munn Z , Moola S , Lisy K , Riitano D , Tufanaru C . Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data . Int J Evid Based Healthc . 2015 ; 13 ( 3 ): 147 - 53 .

Crombie I . Pocket guide to critical appraisal: Oxford . UK : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd ; 1996 .

Gagnier JJ , Kienle G , Altman DG , Moher D , Sox H , Riley D , et al . The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development . J Clin Epidemiol . 2014 ; 67 ( 1 ): 46 - 51 .

Li BH , Yu ZJ , Wang CY , Zi H , Li XD , Wang XH , et al . A preliminary, multicenter, prospective and real world study on the hemostasis, coagulation, and safety of hemocoagulase bothrops atrox in patients undergoing transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic prostatectomy . Front Pharmacol . 2019 ; 10 : 1426 .

Strom BL , Schinnar R , Hennessy S . Comparative effectiveness research. Pharmacoepidemiology . Oxford, UK : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd ; 2012 . p. 561 - 79 .

Whiting P , Rutjes AW , Dinnes J , Reitsma J , Bossuyt PM , Kleijnen J . Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies . Health Technol Assess . 2004 ; 8 ( 25 ): 1 - 234 .

Whiting P , Rutjes AW , Reitsma JB , Bossuyt PM , Kleijnen J . The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews . BMC Med Res Methodol . 2003 ; 3 : 25 .

Whiting PF , Rutjes AW , Westwood ME , Mallett S , Deeks JJ , Reitsma JB , et al . QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies . Ann Intern Med . 2011 ; 155 ( 8 ): 529 - 36 .

Schueler S , Schuetz GM , Dewey M . The revised QUADAS-2 tool . Ann Intern Med . 2012 ; 156 ( 4 ): 323 .

Hoch JS , Dewa CS . An introduction to economic evaluation: what's in a name ? Can J Psychiatr . 2005 ; 50 ( 3 ): 159 - 66 .

Donaldson C , Vale L , Mugford M . Evidence based health economics: from effectiveness to efficiency in systematic review . UK : Oxford University Press ; 2002 .

Drummond MF , Jefferson TO . Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ economic evaluation working party . BMJ . 1996 ; 313 ( 7052 ): 275 - 83 .

Drummond MF , Richardson WS , O'Brien BJ , Levine M , Heyland D . Users' guides to the medical literature. XIII . How to use an article on economic analysis of clinical practice. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-based medicine working group . JAMA . 1997 ; 277 ( 19 ): 1552 - 7 .

Husereau D , Drummond M , Petrou S , Carswell C , Moher D , Greenberg D , et al . Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement . Value Health . 2013 ; 16 ( 2 ): e1 - 5 .

Wong SS , Wilczynski NL , Haynes RB , Hedges T . Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in MEDLINE . Stud Health Technol Inform . 2004 ; 107 ( Pt 1 ): 311 - 6 .

Vardell E , Malloy M . Joanna briggs institute: an evidence-based practice database . Med Ref Serv Q . 2013 ; 32 ( 4 ): 434 - 42 .

Hannes K , Lockwood C . Pragmatism as the philosophical foundation for the Joanna Briggs meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis . J Adv Nurs . 2011 ; 67 ( 7 ): 1632 - 42 .

Spencer L , Ritchie J , Lewis J , Dillon L . Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence . UK : Government Chief Social Researcher's office ; 2003 .

Bouwmeester W , Zuithoff NP , Mallett S , Geerlings MI , Vergouwe Y , Steyerberg EW , et al . Reporting and methods in clinical prediction research: a systematic review . PLoS Med . 2012 ; 9 ( 5 ): 1 - 12 .

Hayden JA , van der Windt DA , Cartwright JL , Cote P , Bombardier C . Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors . Ann Intern Med . 2013 ; 158 ( 4 ): 280 - 6 .

Wolff RF , Moons KGM , Riley RD , Whiting PF , Westwood M , Collins GS , et al . PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies . Ann Intern Med . 2019 ; 170 ( 1 ): 51 - 8 .

Sackett DL , Rosenberg WM , Gray JA , Haynes RB , Richardson WS . Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't . BMJ . 1996 ; 312 ( 7023 ): 71 - 2 .

Tonelli MR . Integrating evidence into clinical practice: an alternative to evidence-based approaches . J Eval Clin Pract . 2006 ; 12 ( 3 ): 248 - 56 .

Woolf SH . Evidence-based medicine and practice guidelines: an overview . Cancer Control . 2000 ; 7 ( 4 ): 362 - 7 .

Polit DF . Assessing measurement in health: beyond reliability and validity . Int J Nurs Stud . 2015 ; 52 ( 11 ): 1746 - 53 .

Polit DF , Beck CT . Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice , ninth edition : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, north American ; 2017 .

Mokkink LB , de Vet HCW , Prinsen CAC , Patrick DL , Alonso J , Bouter LM , et al . COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures . Qual Life Res . 2018 ; 27 ( 5 ): 1171 - 9 .

Mokkink LB , Prinsen CA , Bouter LM , Vet HC , Terwee CB . The consensusbased standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument . Braz J Phys Ther . 2016 ; 20 ( 2 ): 105 - 13 .

Prinsen CAC , Mokkink LB , Bouter LM , Alonso J , Patrick DL , de Vet HCW , et al . COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures . Qual Life Res . 2018 ; 27 ( 5 ): 1147 - 57 .

Swennen MH , van der Heijden GJ , Boeije HR , van Rheenen N , Verheul FJ , van der Graaf Y , et al . Doctors' perceptions and use of evidence-based medicine: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies . Acad Med . 2013 ; 88 ( 9 ): 1384 - 96 .

Gallagher EJ . Systematic reviews: a logical methodological extension of evidence-based medicine . Acad Emerg Med . 1999 ; 6 ( 12 ): 1255 - 60 .

Sacks HS , Berrier J , Reitman D , Ancona-Berk VA , Chalmers TC . Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials . N Engl J Med . 1987 ; 316 ( 8 ): 450 - 5 .

Oxman AD . Checklists for review articles . BMJ . 1994 ; 309 ( 6955 ): 648 - 51 .

Oxman AD , Guyatt GH . Validation of an index of the quality of review articles . J Clin Epidemiol . 1991 ; 44 ( 11 ): 1271 - 8 .

Shea BJ , Grimshaw JM , Wells GA , Boers M , Andersson N , Hamel C , et al . Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews . BMC Med Res Methodol . 2007 ; 7 : 10 .

Shea BJ , Reeves BC , Wells G , Thuku M , Hamel C , Moran J , et al . AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both . BMJ . 2017 ; 358 : j4008 .

Whiting P , Savovic J , Higgins JP , Caldwell DM , Reeves BC , Shea B , et al . ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed . J Clin Epidemiol . 2016 ; 69 : 225 - 34 .

Davis DA , Taylor-Vaisey A . Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines . CMAJ . 1997 ; 157 ( 4 ): 408 - 16 .

Neely JG , Graboyes E , Paniello RC , Sequeira SM , Grindler DJ . Practical guide to understanding the need for clinical practice guidelines . Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2013 ; 149 ( 1 ): 1 - 7 .

Browman GP , Levine MN , Mohide EA , Hayward RS , Pritchard KI , Gafni A , et al . The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation . J Clin Oncol . 1995 ; 13 ( 2 ): 502 - 12 .

Tracy SL . From bench-top to chair-side: how scientific evidence is incorporated into clinical practice . Dent Mater . 2013 ; 30 ( 1 ): 1 - 15 .

Chapa D , Hartung MK , Mayberry LJ , Pintz C . Using preappraised evidence sources to guide practice decisions . J Am Assoc Nurse Pract . 2013 ; 25 ( 5 ): 234 - 43 .

Eibling D , Fried M , Blitzer A , Postma G . Commentary on the role of expert opinion in developing evidence-based guidelines . Laryngoscope . 2013 ; 124 ( 2 ): 355 - 7 .

Chen YL , Yao L , Xiao XJ , Wang Q , Wang ZH , Liang FX , et al . Quality assessment of clinical guidelines in China: 1993–2010 . Chin Med J . 2012 ; 125 ( 20 ): 3660 - 4 .

Hu J , Chen R , Wu S , Tang J , Leng G , Kunnamo I , et al . The quality of clinical practice guidelines in China: a systematic assessment . J Eval Clin Pract . 2013 ; 19 ( 5 ): 961 - 7 .

Henig O , Yahav D , Leibovici L , Paul M . Guidelines for the treatment of pneumonia and urinary tract infections: evaluation of methodological quality using the appraisal of guidelines, research and evaluation ii instrument . Clin Microbiol Infect . 2013 ; 19 ( 12 ): 1106 - 14 .

Vlayen J , Aertgeerts B , Hannes K , Sermeus W , Ramaekers D . A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit . Int J Qual Health Care . 2005 ; 17 ( 3 ): 235 - 42 .

Collaboration A . Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project . Qual Saf Health Care . 2003 ; 12 ( 1 ): 18 - 23 .

Brouwers MC , Kho ME , Browman GP , Burgers JS , Cluzeau F , Feder G , et al . AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care . CMAJ . 2010 ; 182 ( 18 ): E839 - 42 .

Brouwers MC , Kho ME , Browman GP , Burgers JS , Cluzeau F , Feder G , et al . The global rating scale complements the AGREE II in advancing the quality of practice guidelines . J Clin Epidemiol . 2012 ; 65 ( 5 ): 526 - 34 .

Guyatt GH , Oxman AD , Kunz R , Falck-Ytter Y , Vist GE , Liberati A , et al . Going from evidence to recommendations . BMJ . 2008 ; 336 ( 7652 ): 1049 - 51 .

Andrews J , Guyatt G , Oxman AD , Alderson P , Dahm P , Falck-Ytter Y , et al . GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations . J Clin Epidemiol . 2013 ; 66 ( 7 ): 719 - 25 .

Tunguy-Desmarais GP . Evidence-based medicine should be based on science . S Afr Med J . 2013 ; 103 ( 10 ): 700 .

Muckart DJ . Evidence-based medicine - are we boiling the frog ? S Afr Med J . 2013 ; 103 ( 7 ): 447 - 8 .

Mulrow CD . The medical review article: state of the science . Ann Intern Med . 1987 ; 106 ( 3 ): 485 - 8 .

Moher D , Schulz KF , Altman D , Group C . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials . JAMA . 2001 ; 285 ( 15 ): 1987 - 91 .

von Elm E , Altman DG , Egger M , Pocock SJ , Gotzsche PC , Vandenbroucke JP , et al . The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies . Lancet . 2007 ; 370 ( 9596 ): 1453 - 7 .

Sanderson S , Tatt ID , Higgins JP . Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography . Int J Epidemiol . 2007 ; 36 ( 3 ): 666 - 76 .

Willis BH , Quigley M . Uptake of newer methodological developments and the deployment of meta-analysis in diagnostic test research: a systematic review . BMC Med Res Methodol . 2011 ; 11 : 27 .

Whiting PF , Rutjes AW , Westwood ME , Mallett S , Group Q-S . A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies . J Clin Epidemiol . 2013 ; 66 ( 10 ): 1093 - 104 .

Swanson JA , Schmitz D , Chung KC . How to practice evidence-based medicine . Plast Reconstr Surg . 2010 ; 126 ( 1 ): 286 - 94 .

Manchikanti L . Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations . Pain Physician . 2008 ; 11 ( 2 ): 161 - 86 .

Gold C , Erkkila J , Crawford MJ . Shifting effects in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions: a new kind of performance bias ? Acta Psychiatr Scand . 2012 ; 126 ( 5 ): 307 - 14 .

0

浏览量

0

Downloads

26

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

工具集

关联资源

相关文章

暂无数据

相关作者

Mariëtte Z. Meulekamp

Peter van der Wurff

Alfred van der Meer

Cees Lucas

相关机构

Research and Development, Military Rehabilitation Centre

Department of Physiotherapy, HU University of Applied Sciences

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam

⁰