Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma:retrospective randomized control study

Duan Jicheng~(1△); Yue Haiyan~(2△); Liu Kai~1; Wu Mengchao~1; Yang Jiahe~(1) 1Department of Laparoscopy; Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital.Second Military Medical University; Shanghai 200438; China 2Department of Gastroenterology; No.455 Hospital of PLA; Shanghai 200052; China

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma:retrospective randomized control study

Updated：2026-03-12

- Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma:retrospective randomized control study
- Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma:retrospective randomized control study
- 解放军医学杂志（英文版） 2011年26卷第6期页码：316-323
- Affiliations：
- Author bio：
- Funds：
  
  Supported by the grant of Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’ s Republic of China（2008ZX10002-25）;National Natural Science Foundation of China（81070359）
- DOI：
  中图分类号： R735.7
- 纸质出版：2011
- Accepted：
Scan QR Code
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma:retrospective randomized control study[J]. 解放军医学杂志（英文版）, 2011,26(6):316-323.

[1].Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma:retrospective randomized control study[J].Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA,2011,26(06):316-323.
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma:retrospective randomized control study[J]. 解放军医学杂志（英文版）, 2011,26(6):316-323. DOI：

[1].Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma:retrospective randomized control study[J].Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA,2011,26(06):316-323. DOI：

摘要

Abstract

正

Objective:Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation（PRFA） is known to be as effective as hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma（HCC） in the long-term.We wished to ascertain how it is for recurrent small HCC.Methods:From January 2009 to November 2011

a series of sixty-one patients were included in the study according to the criteria:each patient had one recurrent HCC

less than 5 cm in diameter.Twenty-six of the 61 patients were treated with PRFA and the other 35 were treated with repeat hepatectomy.Results:The interval from first surgery to recurrent for repeat hepatectomy and PRFA groups were（1

239.60±1

017.00） d and（903.42±975.11） d respectively（P=0.066）.The tumor-free time after repeat hepatectomy and PRFA were（310.23±159.50） d and（278.27±123.29） d respectively（P=0.584）.Size of tumor in repeat hepatectomy and PRFA were（7.34±3.16） cm

and（5.59±3.40） cm

（P=0.215）

the total expenditure for each patient of the two groups were（26

150.66±7

923.60） yuan and（21

135.00±1

156.76） yuan（RMB）

and the time of hospitalization for each of the two groups were（15.29±4.28） d and（7.46±2.20） d（P

0.001）.Conclusion:PRFA is proved to be as effective as repeat hepatectomy in the treatment of recurrent small HCC

and superior to repeat hepatectomy as it is less invasive.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

Downloads

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据